Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sig wins Next Gen Squad Weapon
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rickt300" data-source="post: 3769045" data-attributes="member: 50678"><p>Obviously your reading comprehension is limited or you would understand that the X250 is not going to be a good SAW. If what I posted is above your pay grade then stop replying. You have yet to address the disparity between the number of rounds 50 is less than 200. A SAW first duty is suppressive fire/base of fire. 50 rounds is 25% of what a M249 can field. I have burned more 5.56 than you have ever seen in your life. A considerable amount of 7.62. I have given you fact and you just run your head and spew BS. What I don't understand is why you are so enthused about an unproven system that has obvious issues and expensive ammunition that is not a NATO round. The 277 Fury may have some benefits, shoot a little flatter and carry a bit more energy way out there. I haven't seen the BC numbers yet so I can't say how much of an improvement 3000 fps and a 140 grain bullet has over a 150 grain bullet at 2800fps. I feel it would take a pretty good shot to actually show any real improvement. No matter what the system 80K psi is going to take a toll on the weapon and most likely force the use of a suppressor. I'd bet those suppressors burn out pretty quick. But since your knowledge base is so weak I felt you were done several posts ago and were just spewing BS to have something to do. By the way the old 55 grain M193 round does often tumble and break up when it hits flesh.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rickt300, post: 3769045, member: 50678"] Obviously your reading comprehension is limited or you would understand that the X250 is not going to be a good SAW. If what I posted is above your pay grade then stop replying. You have yet to address the disparity between the number of rounds 50 is less than 200. A SAW first duty is suppressive fire/base of fire. 50 rounds is 25% of what a M249 can field. I have burned more 5.56 than you have ever seen in your life. A considerable amount of 7.62. I have given you fact and you just run your head and spew BS. What I don't understand is why you are so enthused about an unproven system that has obvious issues and expensive ammunition that is not a NATO round. The 277 Fury may have some benefits, shoot a little flatter and carry a bit more energy way out there. I haven't seen the BC numbers yet so I can't say how much of an improvement 3000 fps and a 140 grain bullet has over a 150 grain bullet at 2800fps. I feel it would take a pretty good shot to actually show any real improvement. No matter what the system 80K psi is going to take a toll on the weapon and most likely force the use of a suppressor. I'd bet those suppressors burn out pretty quick. But since your knowledge base is so weak I felt you were done several posts ago and were just spewing BS to have something to do. By the way the old 55 grain M193 round does often tumble and break up when it hits flesh. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sig wins Next Gen Squad Weapon
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom