Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Skirt possible AWB...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PBramble" data-source="post: 3466420" data-attributes="member: 5778"><p>Any of you guys actually read SCOTUS dissents? </p><p></p><p>In the dissent, Justice Thomas lamented that despite the Supreme Court’s holdings in <em>Heller</em> and <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf" target="_blank"><em>McDonald v. Chicago</em></a>, “several Courts of Appeals… have upheld categorical bans on firearms that millions of Americans commonly own for lawful purposes,” which he made clear was “noncompliance with our Second Amendment precedents.”</p><p></p><p>Justice Thomas went on to explain,</p><p></p><p><em>Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PBramble, post: 3466420, member: 5778"] Any of you guys actually read SCOTUS dissents? In the dissent, Justice Thomas lamented that despite the Supreme Court’s holdings in [I]Heller[/I] and [URL='https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf'][I]McDonald v. Chicago[/I][/URL], “several Courts of Appeals… have upheld categorical bans on firearms that millions of Americans commonly own for lawful purposes,” which he made clear was “noncompliance with our Second Amendment precedents.” Justice Thomas went on to explain, [I]Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Skirt possible AWB...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom