Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Smith and Wesson revolver questions.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YukonGlocker" data-source="post: 2761669" data-attributes="member: 425"><p>For what it's worth, gel testing .38 +P and .357 Mag loads side-by-side with the same bullet out of 2" barrels yields *very* similar results. My recommendation is to become proficient with the .38 +P version, then move to the .357 Mag is you feel the need. I did carry the M&P 340 for a while because I liked the front sight. But I'd rather use the savings in gun price to purchase practice ammo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YukonGlocker, post: 2761669, member: 425"] For what it's worth, gel testing .38 +P and .357 Mag loads side-by-side with the same bullet out of 2" barrels yields *very* similar results. My recommendation is to become proficient with the .38 +P version, then move to the .357 Mag is you feel the need. I did carry the M&P 340 for a while because I liked the front sight. But I'd rather use the savings in gun price to purchase practice ammo. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Smith and Wesson revolver questions.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom