Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
So Much for Bud's Gun Shop
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoBoost" data-source="post: 1725543" data-attributes="member: 3455"><p>Yes, I do have a question - how is it "perfectly legal" if it's clearly against federal law?</p><p>I am not saying that Bud's should be held responsible, but what I'm trying to say, is that unknowingly or unintentionally or ignorantly, one way or another, the transaction is against the law. </p><p></p><p>There was obviously no ill intentions, but just misunderstanding of the law ... or should I say "stretching". Hopefully the original transaction is simply cancelled and money refunded; and OP gets another go with no troubles. Or maybe it'll just slip under the radar and his gun is waiting for him at local FFL to be picked up, I still think it'll look bad on the books.</p><p></p><p>P.S. My quote was there to show that there is a difference between "purchase" and "delivery" - two are separate and follow different regulations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoBoost, post: 1725543, member: 3455"] Yes, I do have a question - how is it "perfectly legal" if it's clearly against federal law? I am not saying that Bud's should be held responsible, but what I'm trying to say, is that unknowingly or unintentionally or ignorantly, one way or another, the transaction is against the law. There was obviously no ill intentions, but just misunderstanding of the law ... or should I say "stretching". Hopefully the original transaction is simply cancelled and money refunded; and OP gets another go with no troubles. Or maybe it'll just slip under the radar and his gun is waiting for him at local FFL to be picked up, I still think it'll look bad on the books. P.S. My quote was there to show that there is a difference between "purchase" and "delivery" - two are separate and follow different regulations. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
So Much for Bud's Gun Shop
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom