State Highway Funding explained

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Banned Supporter
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
17,306
Reaction score
6,213
Location
Under your bed
State Funding History

1985-present



Funding stagnation hampers highways

After Oklahoma’s great era of roadbuilding culminated with construction of the interstate system in the 1960s and 1970s, funding for highway construction and maintenance quickly began to fall behind.

From 1985 to 2005, state highway funding was based almost entirely on fluctuating or diminishing motor fuel tax collections, which had remained stagnant at about $200 million for more than 20 years. Fluctuations in gas prices and increased fuel efficiency decreased the amount of motor fuel taxes collected. Additionally, construction and maintenance expenses continued to grow exponentially due to increased cost of materials, labor, engineering and environmental mandates.

The state appropriation to ODOT in 1985 was about $210 million and the 2005 appropriation was about $200 million. It is estimated that, after inflation, state funding for roads and bridges had actually decreased by 45 percent from 1985 to 2005.

State%20Funding%20Chart%201985-2005.jpg


During this time, Oklahoma relied solely on federal funds for construction while the annual state funding barely covered basic maintenance and operations. There was no funding for asset preservation to keep highways and bridges in good condition after they were constructed or to extend the life of the infrastructure.

By the 1990s, much of Oklahoma’s transportation system had far exceeded its design life, leaving the state with some of the worst highways and bridges in the nation. Bridges that had been built for the traffic of the early 1900s were still in service decades longer than they were designed to be and were in need of major rehabilitation or replacement. Unfortunately, no solution was in sight and, in the mid-1990s, Oklahoma was ranked first in the nation for transportation revenues being diverted to other areas of government. With such low state funding, ODOT was in danger of losing eligibility for federal matching funds for highway construction.

Secretary of Transportation and ODOT Director Neal McCaleb attempted to push the legislature to direct all state motor vehicle taxes and fees to transportation, as is common in other states, but was unsuccessful.






Short-term efforts were made to secure some temporary funding increases for road and bridges through the 1997 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which pledged about $850 million in funds over several years for targeted highway projects of economic significance. While the CIP was successful in expanding highways in certain locations to meet the increasing traffic and freight movement demands of the 1990s economy, it did little for the existing infrastructure system.

At the insistence of Oklahoma Transportation Commission Chairman and later Secretary of Transportation Herschel Crow, ODOT began holding town meetings statewide in the late 1990s to bring the public’s attention to the need for stable and adequate highway funding.





Shocking bridge conditions receive national attention

In May 2002, an errant barge struck one of the piers on the I-40 bridge over the Arkansas River near Webbers Falls, bringing an entire section of the bridge down into the water. The tragic event resulted in 14 fatalities and brought national and international attention to the state. One of the nation’s only coast-to-coast interstate routes, I-40 was out of commission for 65 days while the bridge spans were reconstructed. This meant that tens of thousands of cars and commercial trucks had to be detoured around the closure on rural state highways and over incredibly outdated bridges.

The bridge problem was not only a threat to public safety but also the state’s economy. School buses could not cross some highway bridges and Oklahoma manufacturers and farmers with heavy loads were often forced to detour to other states just to get their products to market. In 2004, an all-time high of 1,168 of the state’s 6,800 highway bridges were rated structurally deficient and Oklahoma had the notorious distinction of having some of the worst-ranked bridges in the nation.



ROADS%20Fund-%20SH-33%20Cox%20Creek%20before.jpg




Director Gary Ridley began a statewide tour to bring the public’s attention to the stark truth that their infrastructure was in such poor shape that ODOT would never catch up without funding reforms. Ridley and other engineers presented to anyone who would listen in cities and towns statewide. They took members of the public and the press on foot to visit bridges, which looked bad but not threatening from the top, while the structures underneath showed shocking signs of decay such as rotting wooden supports and metal plates that had completely rusted through.


ROADS%20Fund-%20Ridley.jpg


Secretary of Transportation and ODOT Director Gary Ridley


Updated funding models proposed


The department’s dire situation was initially met with disbelief and mistrust from members of the legislature. State Rep. Mark Liotta (R-Tulsa), then chairman of the House Appropriations and Budget Subcommittee on Transportation, challenged ODOT’s accountability and requested large amounts of information from the agency. The data showing the chronic underfunding and the condition of the system convinced Liotta and support began to materialize for a new funding model.


ROADS%20Fund-%20Liotta.jpg


State Rep. Mark Liotta


During the 2005 legislative session, the Republican-led House and the Senate, controlled by Democrats, worked with strong support from Secretary of Transportation Phil Tomlinson to pass House Bill 1078. The measure was signed by Gov. Brad Henry, creating the Rebuilding Oklahoma Access and Driver Safety (ROADS) Fund and setting the stage for later improvements in transportation funding.


ROADS%20Fund%20Tomlinson.jpg


Secretary of Transportation Phil Tomlinson



ROADS%20Fund-%20Henry.jpg


Gov. Brad Henry


HB 1078 Summary


  • Increased state transportation funding by $17.5 million each year or by $35 million in years when the state revenue was anticipated to climb at least 3%, until an additional $170 million in annual funding was reached.
  • The new funding would come from an income tax allocation and would be in addition to fuel tax revenue.
In a special September 2005 election, Oklahoma voters soundly defeated a ballot measure that would have increased motor fuel tax rates for the first time since the 1980s and designated the revenue collected solely to transportation projects. With gas and diesel prices soaring following Hurricane Katrina, the fuel tax measure State Question 723 was rejected by more than 87 percent of voters, making it the most lopsided defeat of a ballot measure in state history. SQ 723’s rejection was interpreted as a sign that the voters wanted the state to address its infrastructure problem using exiting revenues rather than through a tax increase.



Historic funding reforms enacted

Though delayed a year by political wrangling, legislation pushed by Liotta and Speaker of the House Todd Hiett (R-Kellyville) called for a direct allocation of income tax proceeds “off-the-top” of state revenues, rather than going through the legislative appropriation process. Support for this method of increasing funding was bolstered by the addition of similar revenue streams for passenger rail, public transit and county road and bridge funding.

ROADS%20Fund-%20Hiett.jpg


Speaker of the House Todd Hiett


During the 2006 special legislative session, House Bill 1176 by State Rep. and future Speaker of the House Chris Benge (R-Tulsa) and Sen. Johnnie Crutchfield (D-Ardmore) was passed with unanimous, bipartisan support. It built on previous legislation by providing an annual increase in ROADS funding and set in motion a reversal of the long-standing, stagnant funding for Oklahoma’s transportation system. The ROADS Fund would support ODOT’s Eight-Year Construction Work Plan, a fiscally constrained plan that included only validated highway projects that balanced the state’s critical needs with available state and federal funding.


HB 1176 Summary

  • Increased the annual state funding to $50 million in years during which the state’s revenue was anticipated to climb at least 3%, or remaining at $17.5 million in years it was not
  • Increased the cap for the ROADS Fund allocation from $170 million to $270 million
  • Created the High Priority Bridge Fund and directed that fuel tax revenue previously deposited in the General Revenue Fund be allocated to the new fund. This amounts to approximately $6 million annually.
  • Provided $70 million to service the debt from the previous decade’s CIP. Prior to this action, ODOT would generally provide the debt service from the operating and construction budgets.
Liotta’s efforts, with ODOT’s support, also took the politics out of transportation projects. Before the Eight-Year Plan, projects had been traditionally chosen by legislators, which created a political system that favored expansion of the system rather than prioritizing needs of the existing infrastructure. Legislators were removed from the project selection process and the professionals at ODOT were placed in charge of selecting only validated, critical highway projects. It was a major political shift in direction in which legislators voluntarily voted themselves out of the power of choosing projects.

The legislation benefitted county roads and bridges through the creation of the County Improvements for Roads and Bridges (CIRB) Fund. The CIRB Fund would receive an allocation of state motor vehicle revenues to fund a Five-Year Plan of major county road and bridge projects overseen by ODOT and the county’s circuit engineering districts. This would take the politics out of county road project selection and help fund major projects that could never have been built by a single county. Since ODOT design standards and contract administration were used, the counties could apply for federal matching funds for these projects.



ROADS%20Fund-%20SH-33%20Cox%20Creek%20after.jpg




Sustainable funding – A journey, not a destination

Subsequent pieces of legislation in 2008, 2010 and 2011 increased the annual income tax allocations, raised the ROADS Fund cap and removed the growth trigger, allowing more revenue to be deposited in the fund.

In 2012, landmark transportation funding legislation House Bill 2248 provided funding to support Gov. Mary Fallin’s Bridge Improvement and Turnpike Modernization Plan.



ROADS%20Fund-%20Fallin.jpg


Gov. Mary Fallin



HB 2248 Summary

  • Beginning in FY 2014, the income tax allocation to ODOT was increased from $41.7 million to $59.7 million with incremental increase of $18 million annually until the ROADS Fund reached the cap of $575 million.
  • Increased ROADS funding would enable ODOT to successfully carry out the governor’s plan for all remaining deficient highway bridges to be programmed for rehabilitation or replacement by 2019.
When combining maximum revenue from the ROADS Fund and the fluctuating fuel taxes, state support for highways and bridges has grown to about $775 million annually by 2019 – over three times the levels in 2005 – finally reaching levels required to sustain a transportation system of Oklahoma’s size.



ROADS%20Fund%201.jpg


Annual ROADS Fund allocations since 2006



Since 2006, major progress has been made on bridges, with more than 1,400 replaced or rehabilitated, and interstate pavement, through reconstruction of much of the interstate system. Highways are receiving safety improvements including paved shoulders and centerline rumble stripes on two-lane highways and cable barriers on divided highways.

Even once all remaining structurally deficient bridges have been addressed by the end of the decade, ODOT will have to continue replacing or rehabilitating at least 90 bridges each year just to keep up with the aging infrastructure system and maintain its bridge program. With bridges finally reaching a manageable state, more resources can be used to address deteriorated pavement, two-lane highways without paved shoulders, steep hills and sharp curves, outdated highway interchanges and growing urban congestion.

Funding increases since 2006 represent a path to a sustainable model for maintaining the single largest asset owned by the state, a highway system valued at $60 billion. Oklahoma was patient in allowing funding to build up over more than decade to where it is today. Rather than the past model of providing one-time funding for specific projects, continued annual allocations to the ROADS Fund will allow ODOT to modernize and preserve the state’s infrastructure, all without new taxes or debt.

Oklahoma’s roads and bridges didn’t deteriorate overnight. Decades of flat funding led to the condition of the transportation system, and it will take decades to catch back up to where the public expects the infrastructure to be and require a long-term commitment to fund asset preservation so highways aren’t allowed to deteriorate again.
 

Glocktogo

Sharpshooter
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
26,602
Reaction score
7,764
Location
Collinsville
This is a positive trend. The 2005 ballot initiative was poorly timed, with fuel prices exceeding $3 a gallon and ultimately climbing to near $4 a gallon. Such a ballot initiative would have a much greater chance of success with fuel under $2 a gallon and an effective PR campaign. An ideal initiative would have a tiered tax system, where the rate would fluctuate up and down as fuel prices do, so as to not excessively harm the consumer during peak price periods.

I will say that locally, ODOT has a contractor refurbishing Hwy 169 between Collinsville and Owasso. What they're doing is different from anything else I've seen in the state. Time will tell if the method results in a surface with long term durability, but right now its pure magic. Seriously, some of the smoothest, quietest concrete road surface in the whole state. :thumb:
 

Tanis143

Sharpshooter
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
2,711
Reaction score
2,448
Location
Broken Arrow
Maybe if they hadn't squandered so much money back in the 80's and 90's I would be more for putting more money into it. But after living most my life in Moore/Norman area and not remembering a time when the I-35, I-40 and I-235 area wasn't under construction I've always thought it was just a racket cooked up between politicians and the companies that won the bids to do this work.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Banned Supporter
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
17,306
Reaction score
6,213
Location
Under your bed
This is a positive trend. The 2005 ballot initiative was poorly timed, with fuel prices exceeding $3 a gallon and ultimately climbing to near $4 a gallon. Such a ballot initiative would have a much greater chance of success with fuel under $2 a gallon and an effective PR campaign. An ideal initiative would have a tiered tax system, where the rate would fluctuate up and down as fuel prices do, so as to not excessively harm the consumer during peak price periods.

I will say that locally, ODOT has a contractor refurbishing Hwy 169 between Collinsville and Owasso. What they're doing is different from anything else I've seen in the state. Time will tell if the method results in a surface with long term durability, but right now its pure magic. Seriously, some of the smoothest, quietest concrete road surface in the whole state. :thumb:
My hope is that this new trend for Criminal Justice reform in OK will result in a savings that will double ODOTS budget, further fund our teachers as well as build some new schools to replace the old ones falling down and give our prison guards a decent salary. The numbers on that savings if we let non violent criminals free for once, should be close to 3 billion a year.
And yes, the new technology in concrete and highway construction is forever evolving and bringing a better product. Hell just 20 years ago they didnt even know we needed to tie slabs together with dowel bars. Now they are retrofitting them in to try and get another 15 years out of those slabs. No longer are the days of dowel bars though, we do CRCP...Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement. I think its 6-8 rebars in the slab, continuously.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Banned Supporter
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
17,306
Reaction score
6,213
Location
Under your bed
Maybe if they hadn't squandered so much money back in the 80's and 90's I would be more for putting more money into it. But after living most my life in Moore/Norman area and not remembering a time when the I-35, I-40 and I-235 area wasn't under construction I've always thought it was just a racket cooked up between politicians and the companies that won the bids to do this work.
Please tell me where they "squandered" money in the 80s?
Do you even know what the state budget was in that era?
Do you also recall the oil bust in the 80s?
Take 3 guesses where ALL our revenue came from in that era and the first 2 guesses dont count (hint, there wasnt a single casino in the state then)
 

Tanis143

Sharpshooter
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
2,711
Reaction score
2,448
Location
Broken Arrow
Please tell me where they "squandered" money in the 80s?
Do you even know what the state budget was in that era?
Do you also recall the oil bust in the 80s?
Take 3 guesses where ALL our revenue came from in that era and the first 2 guesses dont count (hint, there wasnt a single casino in the state then)

I just remember there being a lot of news of construction costs going way above estimates, a few scandals, and that construction on that stretch of highway was consistent. It wasn't until I had grown and moved away that they finally finished it and yet its under construction again. I've lived in a few other states and even projects here in Tulsa never seem to go for that long.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Banned Supporter
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
17,306
Reaction score
6,213
Location
Under your bed
I just remember there being a lot of news of construction costs going way above estimates, a few scandals, and that construction on that stretch of highway was consistent. It wasn't until I had grown and moved away that they finally finished it and yet its under construction again. I've lived in a few other states and even projects here in Tulsa never seem to go for that long.
Dallas/Ft. Worth is constantly under construction and has been for as long as I can recall. It because of the population boom in those areas. OK is experiencing the same growth but on a smaller scale.
More cars means we need more lanes.
 

SoonerP226

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
8,297
Reaction score
4,308
Location
Norman
even projects here in Tulsa never seem to go for that long.
Have you driven on some of those Tulsa cloverleaves? Maybe they should...

Back in the late '80s and early '90s, there were some big, bright lights set up next to I-235; the joke was that ODOT had heard that the sun would be going out in five billion years, and they wanted to make sure they'd have enough light to finish the Broadway Extension.
 

CHenry

Sharpshooter
Banned Supporter
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
17,306
Reaction score
6,213
Location
Under your bed
Back in the late '80s and early '90s, there were some big, bright lights set up next to I-235; the joke was that ODOT had heard that the sun would be going out in five billion years, and they wanted to make sure they'd have enough light to finish the Broadway Extension.
LOL
We do much work at night to have a lesser impact on the driving public who is mostly asleep during those hours.
 
Top Bottom