Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Question 779. Penny tax for teachers raises by the numbers
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokinfun" data-source="post: 2894833" data-attributes="member: 28113"><p>I would agree that the state could handle most of the administration functions in the for the districts, which would reduce the cost . I can not figure out why we have curriculum experts, who are not really experts at anything, and are not part of the hiring, mentoring, or curriculum in individual schools. However, they make 70-80K a year. Also, we pay teachers extra for passing a national board certification, but their students test scores are low. How doe s a test prove they are better teachers? We also pay teachers extra for being department heads, but they do not really do anything either, other than have meetings to meet requirements for having teacher input into administrative decisions. As far as most of this goes, remove sports from the education system. If you want to improve a student's education, put an educator in front of them, not a coach (some coaches are great teachers, but most are not). Having said that, hire coaches as coaches not teachers. If they stop coaching, they should have to reapply to because a regular education teacher.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokinfun, post: 2894833, member: 28113"] I would agree that the state could handle most of the administration functions in the for the districts, which would reduce the cost . I can not figure out why we have curriculum experts, who are not really experts at anything, and are not part of the hiring, mentoring, or curriculum in individual schools. However, they make 70-80K a year. Also, we pay teachers extra for passing a national board certification, but their students test scores are low. How doe s a test prove they are better teachers? We also pay teachers extra for being department heads, but they do not really do anything either, other than have meetings to meet requirements for having teacher input into administrative decisions. As far as most of this goes, remove sports from the education system. If you want to improve a student's education, put an educator in front of them, not a coach (some coaches are great teachers, but most are not). Having said that, hire coaches as coaches not teachers. If they stop coaching, they should have to reapply to because a regular education teacher. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Question 779. Penny tax for teachers raises by the numbers
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom