Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Questions
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rawhide" data-source="post: 2917893" data-attributes="member: 3448"><p>Laws in effect prior to 2015 will not be affected. Future laws will require the state to show a very important state interest to be able to further restrict or regulate agriculture. The question will be any laws passed after 2014 and before 779 would take effect. I think it is worth noting that much of the funding combatting 779 comes from the same interest that would also like to restrict your hunting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rawhide, post: 2917893, member: 3448"] Laws in effect prior to 2015 will not be affected. Future laws will require the state to show a very important state interest to be able to further restrict or regulate agriculture. The question will be any laws passed after 2014 and before 779 would take effect. I think it is worth noting that much of the funding combatting 779 comes from the same interest that would also like to restrict your hunting. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
State Questions
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom