Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Steak-umm's Twitter Account Feuds With Neil deGrasse Tyson Over Science: 'Log Off Bro'
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 3561422" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p>There are a some Christian Apologists that I read or listen to that like to point out that "science is what it is, but scientists are prone to be biased in their proclamations about scientific things."</p><p></p><p>Kind of like Tyson. In that article linked at the Huffpo, he makes this statement:</p><p></p><p>"You don’t have to like gay marriage. Nobody will ever force you to gay-marry. But to create a law preventing fellow citizens from doing so <strong> is to force your personal truths on others. Political attempts to require that others share your personal truths are, in their limit, dictatorships."</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>Is there really anything to a "personal truth?" Isn't it strange that while I might disagree with gay marriage and that a gay might disagree with a heterosexual marriage, that someone would refer to it as a truth? Isn't it just an opinion? Isn't that what some scientists get in early studies of nature or whatever? How many times has something been studied and proclaimed "truth" only to find later that it really wasn't "true?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 3561422, member: 7900"] There are a some Christian Apologists that I read or listen to that like to point out that "science is what it is, but scientists are prone to be biased in their proclamations about scientific things." Kind of like Tyson. In that article linked at the Huffpo, he makes this statement: "You don’t have to like gay marriage. Nobody will ever force you to gay-marry. But to create a law preventing fellow citizens from doing so [B] is to force your personal truths on others. Political attempts to require that others share your personal truths are, in their limit, dictatorships." [/B] Is there really anything to a "personal truth?" Isn't it strange that while I might disagree with gay marriage and that a gay might disagree with a heterosexual marriage, that someone would refer to it as a truth? Isn't it just an opinion? Isn't that what some scientists get in early studies of nature or whatever? How many times has something been studied and proclaimed "truth" only to find later that it really wasn't "true?" [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Steak-umm's Twitter Account Feuds With Neil deGrasse Tyson Over Science: 'Log Off Bro'
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom