Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Study finds higher homicide risk in homes with handguns
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NationalMatch" data-source="post: 3757222" data-attributes="member: 48586"><p>This article hits the news after the Sacramento shootings. The pimps in congress are likely going to install a rabid liberal, anti gun, dim bulb "justice" in scotus, and the gov of kalifornia and creepy Joe are calling for more restrictions on our second amendment rights.</p><p></p><p>The article exposes the weakness of the "research." (For those of you who don't know, Stanford is A) in rabidly liberal/anti gun Bay Area Kalifornia and B) is noted as a research institute.</p><p></p><p>This part caught my eye: <em>"the researchers said they could not determine which victims were killed by the handgun owners or with the in-home weapons."</em></p><p></p><p>That's a huge limitation. They're clearly basing their conclusions upon assumptions they chose to make. They're starting off with a false premise and want us to believe their conclusion is valid. That's impossible. Logic 101. But liberals have been doing that ....... forever.</p><p></p><p>Also, another huge limitation: <em>"They couldn't account for illegal guns and looked only at handguns, not rifles or other firearms." </em></p><p></p><p>We already know illegal guns are a problem, not of gun ownership, but of criminal control. It comes down to the same old story, viz. a particular demographic, the usual suspects, are guilty of 9.5 of 10 gun homicides.</p><p></p><p>Again, stop punishing law abiding gun owners with an anti gun agenda. We're not the problem. Soros funded DAs are the problem. Liberal judges are the problem. Stop releasing these animals back into the population. They are the problem.</p><p></p><p>And this limitation destroys the study: <em>"The dataset also was limited to registered voters in California who were 21 and older."</em> And the lead researcher is in Stanford. As in Bay Area. As in san fransicko. That makes the entire "study" nothing but antigun propaganda, as Seadog says.</p><p></p><p>Finally, they admit (further down in the article, of course) <em>"The rates are low" and the absolute risk is small, but it's important to consider the increase in a person's risk of being killed, Studdert said.</em></p><p></p><p>Statistically, he admits it's a big nothing burger.</p><p></p><p>I post all of this because the globalists are succeeding in destroying The Republic and have to disarm us to complete their plan. The borders are open and inflation is headed to record levels.</p><p></p><p>That's the plan, viz. govt creates the disaster, then swoops in via martial law to protect us. But before they can do that, they've got to take away our guns. And to do that, they've got to erase the Constitution. They've already said it needs to be burned since it was written by a bunch of slave owning white guys.</p><p></p><p>Elections have consequences. Stolen elections, much more so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NationalMatch, post: 3757222, member: 48586"] This article hits the news after the Sacramento shootings. The pimps in congress are likely going to install a rabid liberal, anti gun, dim bulb "justice" in scotus, and the gov of kalifornia and creepy Joe are calling for more restrictions on our second amendment rights. The article exposes the weakness of the "research." (For those of you who don't know, Stanford is A) in rabidly liberal/anti gun Bay Area Kalifornia and B) is noted as a research institute. This part caught my eye: [I]"the researchers said they could not determine which victims were killed by the handgun owners or with the in-home weapons."[/I] That's a huge limitation. They're clearly basing their conclusions upon assumptions they chose to make. They're starting off with a false premise and want us to believe their conclusion is valid. That's impossible. Logic 101. But liberals have been doing that ....... forever. Also, another huge limitation: [I]"They couldn't account for illegal guns and looked only at handguns, not rifles or other firearms." [/I] We already know illegal guns are a problem, not of gun ownership, but of criminal control. It comes down to the same old story, viz. a particular demographic, the usual suspects, are guilty of 9.5 of 10 gun homicides. Again, stop punishing law abiding gun owners with an anti gun agenda. We're not the problem. Soros funded DAs are the problem. Liberal judges are the problem. Stop releasing these animals back into the population. They are the problem. And this limitation destroys the study: [I]"The dataset also was limited to registered voters in California who were 21 and older."[/I] And the lead researcher is in Stanford. As in Bay Area. As in san fransicko. That makes the entire "study" nothing but antigun propaganda, as Seadog says. Finally, they admit (further down in the article, of course) [I]"The rates are low" and the absolute risk is small, but it's important to consider the increase in a person's risk of being killed, Studdert said.[/I] Statistically, he admits it's a big nothing burger. I post all of this because the globalists are succeeding in destroying The Republic and have to disarm us to complete their plan. The borders are open and inflation is headed to record levels. That's the plan, viz. govt creates the disaster, then swoops in via martial law to protect us. But before they can do that, they've got to take away our guns. And to do that, they've got to erase the Constitution. They've already said it needs to be burned since it was written by a bunch of slave owning white guys. Elections have consequences. Stolen elections, much more so. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Study finds higher homicide risk in homes with handguns
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom