Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Suit Filed to Stop Permitless Carry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3284755" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Their narrative is only cover for, and driven by, their agenda.</p><p></p><p>I like that they are loosing ground, but they certainly don't like it! Hence, the shrinking bale of straw. This amounts to nothing more than an act of desperation.</p><p></p><p>If what they claim about this bill is unconstitutional, why didn't they argue against the bill for its supposed unconstitutionality while it was being heard in the legislature, or sitting on the governor's desk waiting to be signed, or as soon as it passed? Obviously, there is nothing to their claim. Is there anything in the bill that doesn't concern the bearing of arms? I haven't seen any such thing. This doesn't even amount to a half decomposed, trampled upon, manure-covered stubble left over from last years harvest.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3284755, member: 745"] Their narrative is only cover for, and driven by, their agenda. I like that they are loosing ground, but they certainly don't like it! Hence, the shrinking bale of straw. This amounts to nothing more than an act of desperation. If what they claim about this bill is unconstitutional, why didn't they argue against the bill for its supposed unconstitutionality while it was being heard in the legislature, or sitting on the governor's desk waiting to be signed, or as soon as it passed? Obviously, there is nothing to their claim. Is there anything in the bill that doesn't concern the bearing of arms? I haven't seen any such thing. This doesn't even amount to a half decomposed, trampled upon, manure-covered stubble left over from last years harvest. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Suit Filed to Stop Permitless Carry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom