Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Supposed Misconduct with a Firearm
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bhop" data-source="post: 1743679" data-attributes="member: 11957"><p>not saying that david is wrong, but I thought there was houses beyond the berms at happy hollow, if thats true and these guys had sufficient backstop, why would hh be allowed to have ppl there to shoot and these guys arent allowed? granted probably should have gotten the officers names that gave u tthe ok and maybe asked after the first incident who was capable of making a offical decision. just my 20 pennies</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bhop, post: 1743679, member: 11957"] not saying that david is wrong, but I thought there was houses beyond the berms at happy hollow, if thats true and these guys had sufficient backstop, why would hh be allowed to have ppl there to shoot and these guys arent allowed? granted probably should have gotten the officers names that gave u tthe ok and maybe asked after the first incident who was capable of making a offical decision. just my 20 pennies [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Supposed Misconduct with a Firearm
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom