Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
"Supreme" Court.........2A issue
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2402947" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>All correct and factual ref<img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" />ue Process but your assertion that the reason for going that path is because of a selfish desire to perpatuate their own importance is nothing but conjecture. In fact, a very strong argument can, and has, been made that Due Process Cases are a safer, much lower risk way to approach arguments where one advers ruling can have enormous consequences. This can be especially important if the court votes are in doubt. Effectively, a judgement call has been made that it is better to seek small victories that with a higher probability of victory than a high-risk one time roll of the dice in which you might lose even what you have already. You may disagree with that but that doesn't mean it is driven by a crass, self-serving motive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2402947, member: 18914"] All correct and factual ref:Due Process but your assertion that the reason for going that path is because of a selfish desire to perpatuate their own importance is nothing but conjecture. In fact, a very strong argument can, and has, been made that Due Process Cases are a safer, much lower risk way to approach arguments where one advers ruling can have enormous consequences. This can be especially important if the court votes are in doubt. Effectively, a judgement call has been made that it is better to seek small victories that with a higher probability of victory than a high-risk one time roll of the dice in which you might lose even what you have already. You may disagree with that but that doesn't mean it is driven by a crass, self-serving motive. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
"Supreme" Court.........2A issue
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom