Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court backs Hobby Lobby
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FamousAJ" data-source="post: 2563527" data-attributes="member: 9545"><p>It's bad enough that we have the government too involved in our personal lives, but now we're going to endorse our employers dictating how we should live and allow them to discriminate against female employees? Basically what the supporters are all endorsing is that a woman who knows she doesn't want children and who is trying to be responsible by using pills & IUDs and who works to support herself can't make those choices for herself because now it is her employer's decision on whether she will be able to afford to protect herself.</p><p></p><p>And if your argument is that she can buy them without insurance, supporters are delusional & misinformed. An average woman working to support herself can't afford birth control pills without insurance's aide</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FamousAJ, post: 2563527, member: 9545"] It's bad enough that we have the government too involved in our personal lives, but now we're going to endorse our employers dictating how we should live and allow them to discriminate against female employees? Basically what the supporters are all endorsing is that a woman who knows she doesn't want children and who is trying to be responsible by using pills & IUDs and who works to support herself can't make those choices for herself because now it is her employer's decision on whether she will be able to afford to protect herself. And if your argument is that she can buy them without insurance, supporters are delusional & misinformed. An average woman working to support herself can't afford birth control pills without insurance's aide [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court backs Hobby Lobby
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom