Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court looks to medieval England in gun rights case
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fredkrueger100" data-source="post: 3665532" data-attributes="member: 24577"><p>Ridiculous. We don’t need to go back into England’s history to decide what the 2A says. We know what the heck it means. We don’t need a corrupt court to tell us what we can and can’t do. Scalia didn’t follow the bill of rights or the 2A when he made his opinion on the Heller case. I don’t expect this joke of a court to do what is actually constitutional. They act like understanding the constitution and bill of rights is so hard. The second amendment is so clear it ain’t even funny. It is the only amendment that says “shall not be infringed “. That means to not touch it. But it’s the amendment that has been assaulted the most. Gee, I wonder why that is? It sure ain’t for our safety. It’s what the government does. They use safety and fear to gain more control over us. Sadly we have a lot of dumb citizens that don’t realize that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fredkrueger100, post: 3665532, member: 24577"] Ridiculous. We don’t need to go back into England’s history to decide what the 2A says. We know what the heck it means. We don’t need a corrupt court to tell us what we can and can’t do. Scalia didn’t follow the bill of rights or the 2A when he made his opinion on the Heller case. I don’t expect this joke of a court to do what is actually constitutional. They act like understanding the constitution and bill of rights is so hard. The second amendment is so clear it ain’t even funny. It is the only amendment that says “shall not be infringed “. That means to not touch it. But it’s the amendment that has been assaulted the most. Gee, I wonder why that is? It sure ain’t for our safety. It’s what the government does. They use safety and fear to gain more control over us. Sadly we have a lot of dumb citizens that don’t realize that. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Supreme Court looks to medieval England in gun rights case
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom