Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Suspended License / No Insurance
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="inactive" data-source="post: 1769582" data-attributes="member: 7488"><p>I never asserted anything contrary to your statements.</p><p></p><p><strong>1. Driving DUS is a jailable offence. state statue 47 6-303 misdemeanor offense</strong></p><p></p><p>I never said it was not "jailable." In fact, I understand that any ticket/citation can become a offense where one is taken into custody, depending on the events and outcome (i.e. refusing to sign a ticket). </p><p></p><p>I simply offered that "I tend <em>to think</em> no; these offenses on their own do not constitute an arrest (i.e. hook 'em up and take them to the station) but rather citations." (Emphasis mine). Which most officers seem to agree with, based on the anecdotal comments in this thread where offenders are simply cited if even that. What statute allows and what pragmatic officers do may vary quite a bit.</p><p></p><p><strong>2. If you allow/permit a person to drive that is DUS/unauthorized you can be cited a ticked read state statue 47 6-305 misdemeanor offense</strong></p><p></p><p>I never said that was wise, or legal. I did note that some insurance polices may still afford coverage to those who are permissively allowed to drive a vehicle. This may be true despite the driver being unlicensed.</p><p></p><p><strong>3. Failure to comply with compulsory insurance law state statue 47 7-606.A.1 misdemeanor offense</strong></p><p></p><p>I never said one should drive without insurance. </p><p></p><p>More specifically, you should clarify that insurance is not compulsory. Financial responsibility is compulsory, which is mostly handled by a liability policy covering the vehicle. There are other options.</p><p></p><p><strong>4. Punishment of misdemeanor state statue 21 10</strong></p><p></p><p>Not sure which of my comments you are relating this to ??</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Before you label me as misleading, you need to understand the context and intent of my comments. Some of the questions here end up being very narrow, and thus receive very specific answers (like the ones I gave).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="inactive, post: 1769582, member: 7488"] I never asserted anything contrary to your statements. [B]1. Driving DUS is a jailable offence. state statue 47 6-303 misdemeanor offense[/B] I never said it was not "jailable." In fact, I understand that any ticket/citation can become a offense where one is taken into custody, depending on the events and outcome (i.e. refusing to sign a ticket). I simply offered that "I tend [I]to think[/I] no; these offenses on their own do not constitute an arrest (i.e. hook 'em up and take them to the station) but rather citations." (Emphasis mine). Which most officers seem to agree with, based on the anecdotal comments in this thread where offenders are simply cited if even that. What statute allows and what pragmatic officers do may vary quite a bit. [B]2. If you allow/permit a person to drive that is DUS/unauthorized you can be cited a ticked read state statue 47 6-305 misdemeanor offense[/B] I never said that was wise, or legal. I did note that some insurance polices may still afford coverage to those who are permissively allowed to drive a vehicle. This may be true despite the driver being unlicensed. [B]3. Failure to comply with compulsory insurance law state statue 47 7-606.A.1 misdemeanor offense[/B] I never said one should drive without insurance. More specifically, you should clarify that insurance is not compulsory. Financial responsibility is compulsory, which is mostly handled by a liability policy covering the vehicle. There are other options. [B]4. Punishment of misdemeanor state statue 21 10[/B] Not sure which of my comments you are relating this to ?? Before you label me as misleading, you need to understand the context and intent of my comments. Some of the questions here end up being very narrow, and thus receive very specific answers (like the ones I gave). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Suspended License / No Insurance
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom