Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sutherland Springs church shooting is Academy's fault?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OKNewshawk" data-source="post: 3210327" data-attributes="member: 6592"><p>No, it goes back even before that. Lawyers have always used the philosophy of "deepest pockets" in determining who to sue in liability cases. I remember, back in the 1980s, reading about a lawsuit where the family members of a man killed in a motorcycle accident sued Bell Helmets--even though <em>the deceased was <strong>not</strong> wearing a helmet at the time of the accident!</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OKNewshawk, post: 3210327, member: 6592"] No, it goes back even before that. Lawyers have always used the philosophy of "deepest pockets" in determining who to sue in liability cases. I remember, back in the 1980s, reading about a lawsuit where the family members of a man killed in a motorcycle accident sued Bell Helmets--even though [I]the deceased was [B]not[/B] wearing a helmet at the time of the accident![/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Sutherland Springs church shooting is Academy's fault?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom