Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
SW M&P22 or M&P compact 22
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aarondhgraham" data-source="post: 2736015" data-attributes="member: 13337"><p>I say, of the two, get the M&P Compact.</p><p></p><p>The full size is not designed or made by S&W,,,</p><p>The Compact <strong>is</strong> designed and made by S&W.</p><p></p><p>Every review I have read says the Compact is a much better performing pistol,,,</p><p>Apparently it was designed to cycle with standard velocity ammo.</p><p></p><p>I have fired both and was not impressed with the full size,,,</p><p>I did like the way the Compact performed.</p><p></p><p>Now having said that,,,</p><p>I don't like the <strong>internal hammer single-action</strong>.</p><p></p><p>It's just like all of the target style 22 pistols (Ruger Mark, Buckmark, 22/45, S&W 22A, NEOS),,,</p><p>Once you chamber a round there is no way to de-cock the gun or lower the hammer,,,</p><p>You rely completely on the manual safety.</p><p></p><p>If this is a not a concern I say get the M&P Compact.</p><p></p><p>If that <strong>is</strong> a concern for you,,,</p><p>Look at the Ruger SR-22.</p><p></p><p>It's the same physical size as the M&P Compact,,,</p><p>But has an external hammer and a decocker.</p><p></p><p>Aarond</p><p></p><p>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aarondhgraham, post: 2736015, member: 13337"] I say, of the two, get the M&P Compact. The full size is not designed or made by S&W,,, The Compact [I][/I][B]is[/B] designed and made by S&W. Every review I have read says the Compact is a much better performing pistol,,, Apparently it was designed to cycle with standard velocity ammo. I have fired both and was not impressed with the full size,,, I did like the way the Compact performed. Now having said that,,, I don't like the [B]internal hammer single-action[/B]. It's just like all of the target style 22 pistols (Ruger Mark, Buckmark, 22/45, S&W 22A, NEOS),,, Once you chamber a round there is no way to de-cock the gun or lower the hammer,,, You rely completely on the manual safety. If this is a not a concern I say get the M&P Compact. If that [U][/U][B]is[/B] a concern for you,,, Look at the Ruger SR-22. It's the same physical size as the M&P Compact,,, But has an external hammer and a decocker. Aarond . [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
SW M&P22 or M&P compact 22
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom