Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Take the Guns first, Due process second...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerryMiller" data-source="post: 3088681" data-attributes="member: 7900"><p>I'll say it again. While a vote for a third party candidate might be a satisfying "protest" vote, what will you end up with if doing that or not voting. Any protest vote for a Libertarian or Green Party candidate is nothing more than enabling one of the "major" parties to win the election. So, if you vote for "X" of the Libertarian or Green Party, will you be happy with an Elizabeth Warren, Kamela Harris, or any other "wacko" that is in those parties?</p><p></p><p>I have a relative that voted twice for Ross Perot. That relative has since expressed great regret for helping us get a womanizing president that also had questionable dealings with moneyed people, including the Chinese.</p><p></p><p>I'll add this: anyone voting for a candidate based on ONE ISSUE isn't voting responsibly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerryMiller, post: 3088681, member: 7900"] I'll say it again. While a vote for a third party candidate might be a satisfying "protest" vote, what will you end up with if doing that or not voting. Any protest vote for a Libertarian or Green Party candidate is nothing more than enabling one of the "major" parties to win the election. So, if you vote for "X" of the Libertarian or Green Party, will you be happy with an Elizabeth Warren, Kamela Harris, or any other "wacko" that is in those parties? I have a relative that voted twice for Ross Perot. That relative has since expressed great regret for helping us get a womanizing president that also had questionable dealings with moneyed people, including the Chinese. I'll add this: anyone voting for a candidate based on ONE ISSUE isn't voting responsibly. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Take the Guns first, Due process second...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom