Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Talk To Me About 922r Compliance
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zghorner" data-source="post: 2869443" data-attributes="member: 35089"><p>I might know a guy that knows a guy that has 4 Russian shotguns that might not be 922r compliant...hell from what ive read simply changing the factory 5rd mag with a high cap mag makes it non compliant so 90% of the saigas listed for sale are NON compliant correct? same goes for the MAK-90s pictured with 30rd mags not to mention non-thumbhole stocks. Never ever hear of anything coming of it though....Does anyone know of a case or charge against someone for having a non 922r compliant firearm? I feel like if you posted pictures saying "hey I converted this post '86 gun to full auto using a surplus sear I found" you would have some black suits show up at your door.</p><p></p><p>I remember reading a pretty cool thread over at FALfiles about 922r: <a href="http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=261731" target="_blank">My ATF Letter</a> </p><p></p><p>From what I've gathered...the person who "manufactures" (modifies) the gun into non 922r compliant form is responsible...but since it is very difficult to prove who did the modification it will not be pursued?</p><p></p><p>Usually in these types of threads someone pops off with something like "no known cases, but I don't want to be the first" or "i don't want to be the one they make an example of". which is a reasonable argument to me...the last thing any gun guy or gal wants is a run in with the ATF.</p><p></p><p>So what say you OSA? I know their are some pretty stinkin smart legal beagles on here that I would love to learn from on this issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zghorner, post: 2869443, member: 35089"] I might know a guy that knows a guy that has 4 Russian shotguns that might not be 922r compliant...hell from what ive read simply changing the factory 5rd mag with a high cap mag makes it non compliant so 90% of the saigas listed for sale are NON compliant correct? same goes for the MAK-90s pictured with 30rd mags not to mention non-thumbhole stocks. Never ever hear of anything coming of it though....Does anyone know of a case or charge against someone for having a non 922r compliant firearm? I feel like if you posted pictures saying "hey I converted this post '86 gun to full auto using a surplus sear I found" you would have some black suits show up at your door. I remember reading a pretty cool thread over at FALfiles about 922r: [URL='http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=261731']My ATF Letter[/URL] From what I've gathered...the person who "manufactures" (modifies) the gun into non 922r compliant form is responsible...but since it is very difficult to prove who did the modification it will not be pursued? Usually in these types of threads someone pops off with something like "no known cases, but I don't want to be the first" or "i don't want to be the one they make an example of". which is a reasonable argument to me...the last thing any gun guy or gal wants is a run in with the ATF. So what say you OSA? I know their are some pretty stinkin smart legal beagles on here that I would love to learn from on this issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Talk To Me About 922r Compliance
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom