Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus 709
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow" data-source="post: 1184802" data-attributes="member: 7123"><p>It may be 'in between', but as I said above (with emphasis):</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Plus the ones you mention: Sig, Steyr, HK, FN, S&W, Ruger; ditto, all of them.</p><p></p><p>Are you disputing that specific statement? I think that you are, but want to be sure what you're saying. I believe that you are placing a specific definition on your phrase "european grip", where none exists. That is a nebulous or ill-defined phrase. What specific grip angle, or range of angles, between 0 and 45 degrees, does that phrase reflect, in your definition of the phrase?</p><p></p><p>Please set aside the phrase "euro grip", which is meaningless to me. What is not meaningless are the actual ergos of the gun, which are dependent solely upon math/ geometry in the design, not phrases - again:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a true statement, no? Protractor time, I guess! <img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /> Gimme a couple days to design a repeatable & valid algorithm to measure these bad boys as they actually sit in people's hands - should be an interesting experiment, and hey - I just may prove myself wrong - I'll be the first to admit if I'm wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, post: 1184802, member: 7123"] It may be 'in between', but as I said above (with emphasis): Plus the ones you mention: Sig, Steyr, HK, FN, S&W, Ruger; ditto, all of them. Are you disputing that specific statement? I think that you are, but want to be sure what you're saying. I believe that you are placing a specific definition on your phrase "european grip", where none exists. That is a nebulous or ill-defined phrase. What specific grip angle, or range of angles, between 0 and 45 degrees, does that phrase reflect, in your definition of the phrase? Please set aside the phrase "euro grip", which is meaningless to me. What is not meaningless are the actual ergos of the gun, which are dependent solely upon math/ geometry in the design, not phrases - again: This is a true statement, no? Protractor time, I guess! :) Gimme a couple days to design a repeatable & valid algorithm to measure these bad boys as they actually sit in people's hands - should be an interesting experiment, and hey - I just may prove myself wrong - I'll be the first to admit if I'm wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Taurus 709
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom