Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Texas Religious Liberty Law Signed
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donner" data-source="post: 3242100" data-attributes="member: 277"><p>i don't know why it's considered fine for the government to determine that two men can't be married or that two women can't be married, but hey, i'm for less government, not more, so what do i know.</p><p></p><p>But hey, the gays really should have just been glad they've stopped being legally penalized (as previously happened) or executed (as has been suggested by some as recent as a few weeks ago), am i right? Yeah, seems like enough hatred to go around.</p><p></p><p>if people really wanted to protect 'traditional marriage' then they should have worked to stop it from creeping into our laws and left it in the realm of religion. But as it stood, we had a lot of laws that affected 'married' people differently than singles and those with civil unions. IIRC, civil unions worked at the state level, but did not extend to the federal level for such things as tax breaks and social security benefits, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donner, post: 3242100, member: 277"] i don't know why it's considered fine for the government to determine that two men can't be married or that two women can't be married, but hey, i'm for less government, not more, so what do i know. But hey, the gays really should have just been glad they've stopped being legally penalized (as previously happened) or executed (as has been suggested by some as recent as a few weeks ago), am i right? Yeah, seems like enough hatred to go around. if people really wanted to protect 'traditional marriage' then they should have worked to stop it from creeping into our laws and left it in the realm of religion. But as it stood, we had a lot of laws that affected 'married' people differently than singles and those with civil unions. IIRC, civil unions worked at the state level, but did not extend to the federal level for such things as tax breaks and social security benefits, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Texas Religious Liberty Law Signed
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom