Thank you Senator McCain for killing Obamacare repeal.

[dennishoddy]

Ace is right, (even a broken clock is right twice a day lol) it wasnt Obama that ever tried to act on gun control but there were others who did. Gifford and Pelosi come to mind.

Refer to post 110

 

[Glocktogo]

Refer to post 110

Revisionist history has been around as long as, well, history! It never works on everyone, but it always works on someone!

 

[caojyn]

OSA match the quotes

1. "Certain forms of ammunition have no legitimate sporting, recreational, or self-defense use and thus should be prohibited."

2. “I do not believe in taking away the right of the citizen for sporting, for hunting and so forth, or for home defense. But I do believe that an AK-47, a machine gun, is not a sporting weapon or needed for defense of a home.”

3. "There is no reason why, on the street today, a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons."

Revisionist history has been around as long as, well, history! It never works on everyone, but it always works on someone!

Well... can't argue with that

 

[JD8]

You guys might want to let Obama know he never put forth any effort in gun control. Never mind he spoke out after every shooting like clockwork blaming the firearms used, in lieu of concentrating on the individual or motive.

Let's see what Liberal MSM has to say about this....

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/01/16/us/obama-gun-control-proposal.html

• Requiring criminal background checks for all gun sales, including those by private sellers that currently are exempt.

• Reinstating and strengthening the ban on assault weapons that was in place from 1994 to 2004.

• Limiting ammunition magazines to 10 rounds.

• Banning the possession of armor-piercing bullets by anyone other than members of the military and law enforcement.

Take it from the horses mouth....

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/us/politics/obama-to-ask-congress-to-toughen-gun-laws.html?ref=us

Who is this calling it a shameful day when defeated?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...fb7e977ef71_story.html?utm_term=.92297d78f61a

 

[JD8]

OSA match the quotes

1. "Certain forms of ammunition have no legitimate sporting, recreational, or self-defense use and thus should be prohibited."

2. “I do not believe in taking away the right of the citizen for sporting, for hunting and so forth, or for home defense. But I do believe that an AK-47, a machine gun, is not a sporting weapon or needed for defense of a home.”

3. "There is no reason why, on the street today, a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons."



Well... can't argue with that

Yep, Reagan said #3...... in 1967. Let's apply that here in some sort of two wrongs equal a right narrative? Pointing a finger to what Reagan said 50 years ago doesn't justify Obama's or Feinstein's actions.

 

[caojyn]

Yep, Reagan said #3...... in 1967. Let's apply that here in some sort of two wrongs equal a right narrative? Pointing a finger to what Reagan said 50 years ago doesn't justify Obama's or Feinstein's actions.

Well you got 30% correct anyway. Never said two wrongs make a right, just that neither party cares about them.

 

[JD8]

Well you got 30% correct anyway. Never said two wrongs make a right, just that neither party cares about them.

I only answered one because I understood what you were getting at, as it's the status quo for the cheap seats around here. You cheap seat boys need to put on your thinking caps from time to time. Now if neither party cares about gun rights then why is there such a variance of rights between let's say.... Chicago and Tulsa?

 

[Glocktogo]

I only answered one because I understood what you were getting at, as it's the status quo for the cheap seats around here. You cheap seat boys need to put on your thinking caps from time to time. Now if neither party cares about gun rights then why is there such a variance of rights between let's say.... Chicago and Tulsa?

It's impossible to deny that on a national level, Democrats are FAR more likely to implement laws against self-determination, which includes gun rights. Anyone trying to assert some sort of false equivalency between the two major parties is disingenuous at best.

 

[caojyn]

I only answered one because I understood what you were getting at, as it's the status quo for the cheap seats around here. You cheap seat boys need to put on your thinking caps from time to time. Now if neither party cares about gun rights then why is there such a variance of rights between let's say.... Chicago and Tulsa?

I guess you got me there, republicans do care about 2A because Tulsa/Chicago, and the messianic Reagan didn't damage the 2A more than any other sitting president

 

[Shadowrider]

I guess you got me there, republicans do care about 2A because Tulsa/Chicago, and the messianic Reagan didn't damage the 2A more than any other sitting president

You've said this a couple times now that I've seen. Care to give examples for us blind followers?