I remember studying about the early days of our nation’s history and how a whole lot of those old guys and even some of the new states as a whole were not so sure about this whole “Constitution” thing. I mean, here we had been fighting to get out from under an oppressive, burdensome, top-heavy government and all of a sudden, well...we did, and the new guys in charge decide they wanna lay out their version of what is okay as far as “the people” and what isn’t okay and then make everybody sign it. So some of the more recalcitrant knuckleheads said they’d only do it if James Madison would write down some amendments to this brand new Constitution thing and base it largely on Virginia’s Declaration of Rights. James M. was a pretty good writer, and that’s about all they could agree on. Politicians....sheeesh!
They never change.
It seems that Madison took the shortcut and rather than reinvent the wheel, so to speak, he more or less did just copy it off Virginia largely to satisfy those hold-outs. Government was in its infancy but had already learned to stonewall, pander, bribe and so on. They said “git ‘et done” and so he did.
But...but...but base this bunch of changes or whatever on something from Virginia? “What’s up with that”? Asked one old fat guy with round glasses and a cheap wig. See, Virginia was well known as a model of free ideas, and free men, with a whole new way of looking at things rather than just having some far away king bossin’ everybody around and taxin’ the crap outta ya and stuff. People at that times were pretty fed up with all that king stuff alright, and decided that they wanted to be in charge of themselves for a change. John Hancock, another rich bigshot back then, basically told that stinkin’ king “Go screw yourself, King. You’re not the boss of me”.
So Madison wrote like 17 amendments, and then after a lot of cussin and discussin’ and stuff, they whittled it down to 12. But at the end of the day, the politicians from all these new states were still not sold on the idea of a powerful Federal Government and really wanted to keep more power for the states, and for the individual people in those states. So when they voted, they only agreed on and ratified 10 of ‘em. And they called them The Bill of Rights.
The whole idea was to provide for a set of rights to protect individual citizens from the possibility of an overpowering, crushingly oppressive government, like the one they’d just beat the crap out of in the war. Wars suck, but overly powerful governments suck even worser. Like a whole lot more worse even.
The purpose of The Bill of Rights is to provide for certain constitutional rights of individuals in relation to their government. It is NOT about the rights of the government, it is about the rights of “we the people”.
You may notice when you read the thing that the first several refer to “the people.” Like “the people” have the right to assemble, to free speech, to keep and bear arms and such. The people this, the people that. There is nothing in the Bill of Rights about the rights of the government; nope. It’s all about the rights of the people.
So you Dems and leftists liberals can whine and cry all you want and you can damn well just stop with that lame crap about “the militia means the National Guard”. It’s about the people fool, individuals, and the people IS the damn militia, and the whole idea is to give us some safeguards against thugs like you from oppressing us ever, and I say again ever, again. Think I’m kidding? Try me. Here; pull my finger...
And that’s all I have to say about that. For now.
EDIT: Lemme just post this here so you don't have to go look it up.
The Bill of Rights – First 10 Amendments
They never change.
It seems that Madison took the shortcut and rather than reinvent the wheel, so to speak, he more or less did just copy it off Virginia largely to satisfy those hold-outs. Government was in its infancy but had already learned to stonewall, pander, bribe and so on. They said “git ‘et done” and so he did.
But...but...but base this bunch of changes or whatever on something from Virginia? “What’s up with that”? Asked one old fat guy with round glasses and a cheap wig. See, Virginia was well known as a model of free ideas, and free men, with a whole new way of looking at things rather than just having some far away king bossin’ everybody around and taxin’ the crap outta ya and stuff. People at that times were pretty fed up with all that king stuff alright, and decided that they wanted to be in charge of themselves for a change. John Hancock, another rich bigshot back then, basically told that stinkin’ king “Go screw yourself, King. You’re not the boss of me”.
So Madison wrote like 17 amendments, and then after a lot of cussin and discussin’ and stuff, they whittled it down to 12. But at the end of the day, the politicians from all these new states were still not sold on the idea of a powerful Federal Government and really wanted to keep more power for the states, and for the individual people in those states. So when they voted, they only agreed on and ratified 10 of ‘em. And they called them The Bill of Rights.
The whole idea was to provide for a set of rights to protect individual citizens from the possibility of an overpowering, crushingly oppressive government, like the one they’d just beat the crap out of in the war. Wars suck, but overly powerful governments suck even worser. Like a whole lot more worse even.
The purpose of The Bill of Rights is to provide for certain constitutional rights of individuals in relation to their government. It is NOT about the rights of the government, it is about the rights of “we the people”.
You may notice when you read the thing that the first several refer to “the people.” Like “the people” have the right to assemble, to free speech, to keep and bear arms and such. The people this, the people that. There is nothing in the Bill of Rights about the rights of the government; nope. It’s all about the rights of the people.
So you Dems and leftists liberals can whine and cry all you want and you can damn well just stop with that lame crap about “the militia means the National Guard”. It’s about the people fool, individuals, and the people IS the damn militia, and the whole idea is to give us some safeguards against thugs like you from oppressing us ever, and I say again ever, again. Think I’m kidding? Try me. Here; pull my finger...
And that’s all I have to say about that. For now.
EDIT: Lemme just post this here so you don't have to go look it up.
The Bill of Rights – First 10 Amendments
- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
- A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
- No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
- The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
- No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
- In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
- In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
- Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
- The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
- The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Last edited: