Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
The Importance of Pistol Caliber in Home Defense
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NationalMatch" data-source="post: 3770511" data-attributes="member: 48586"><p>And, as stated in the other thread, you need to read the actual law. Aries quoted the pertinent section: "I believe the relevant section is page 42</p><p>TITLE 21 § 1289.25 PHYSICAL OR DEADLY FORCE AGAINST INTRUDER.."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your assumptions are predicated upon whether a DA decides to prosecute. </p><p></p><p>Our comments are predicated upon the lawfulness of the self defense shooting. </p><p></p><p>If the SD shooting is unlawful, then, it no longer applies to the earlier conversation (to which you alluded). The earlier thread was entitled, "At what point are you <em><strong>justified</strong></em> 2 use force?"</p><p></p><p>The title presupposes a legal shooting. That's all. Any other speculation is an entirely different topic. </p><p></p><p>If one is justified, he is immune. But, if anyone (foolishly) accepts your comments as legitimate, then no one will attempt to defend himself against aggression.</p><p></p><p>And that perspective belongs in The People's Republic Of Kalifornistan. Not in a free state.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NationalMatch, post: 3770511, member: 48586"] And, as stated in the other thread, you need to read the actual law. Aries quoted the pertinent section: "I believe the relevant section is page 42 TITLE 21 § 1289.25 PHYSICAL OR DEADLY FORCE AGAINST INTRUDER.." Your assumptions are predicated upon whether a DA decides to prosecute. Our comments are predicated upon the lawfulness of the self defense shooting. If the SD shooting is unlawful, then, it no longer applies to the earlier conversation (to which you alluded). The earlier thread was entitled, "At what point are you [I][B]justified[/B][/I] 2 use force?" The title presupposes a legal shooting. That's all. Any other speculation is an entirely different topic. If one is justified, he is immune. But, if anyone (foolishly) accepts your comments as legitimate, then no one will attempt to defend himself against aggression. And that perspective belongs in The People's Republic Of Kalifornistan. Not in a free state. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
The Importance of Pistol Caliber in Home Defense
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom