Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
The Open Carry Argument
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Norman" data-source="post: 1961327" data-attributes="member: 4232"><p>It was an okay essay. It was mostly opinion without any supporting facts, and skewed through the author's bias. It pretty much ignores most of the data compiled by people like Tom Givens, and fails to address why there are no credible instructors that teach and champion OC to my knowledge. I would like to know what the author's training and experience is in carrying a weapon, as well as defensive encounters. Why has he made a distinction between 'offensive' and defensive actions in a fight. Those terms come into play before engaging in a fight. There were no citations in reference to his 5 stages of defensive confrontations (that I noticed). Where did this come from? Did he make it up? From what data? Why did he ignore that an OCer had his weapon taken away, was killed with it, and another man was shot with said weapon later?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Norman, post: 1961327, member: 4232"] It was an okay essay. It was mostly opinion without any supporting facts, and skewed through the author's bias. It pretty much ignores most of the data compiled by people like Tom Givens, and fails to address why there are no credible instructors that teach and champion OC to my knowledge. I would like to know what the author's training and experience is in carrying a weapon, as well as defensive encounters. Why has he made a distinction between 'offensive' and defensive actions in a fight. Those terms come into play before engaging in a fight. There were no citations in reference to his 5 stages of defensive confrontations (that I noticed). Where did this come from? Did he make it up? From what data? Why did he ignore that an OCer had his weapon taken away, was killed with it, and another man was shot with said weapon later? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
The Open Carry Argument
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom