Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The second amendment and military grade firearms
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Super Dave" data-source="post: 1593956" data-attributes="member: 8429"><p>A good read, but it's been said over and over again. I know it, you know it. The trouble is, although the country is filled with firearm owners, who among them would actually stick their necks out to do what's right?</p><p></p><p>I agree, there is no good reason any law abiding citizen should not be able to own a military weapon, like M-16, AK, or even something of newer design, manufactured last year. There is no good reason to impose a $200 tax. There is no good reason to require that law abiding citizens that do own said weapons should be on a registry. The fact is, it hinders our right to bear arms (any arm we should choose) for the very reason of overcoming the tyranny of government gone wild. BUT... unless we stand as a whole people, it will only continue to get more restrictive, just as the Governor of Pennsylvania said way back when, as he gave Parliament his thoughts on the matter of disarming the people. The fact is, it will never happen (standing united on the problem). Sad, but true. </p><p></p><p>Did you see the author is from Midwest City?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Super Dave, post: 1593956, member: 8429"] A good read, but it's been said over and over again. I know it, you know it. The trouble is, although the country is filled with firearm owners, who among them would actually stick their necks out to do what's right? I agree, there is no good reason any law abiding citizen should not be able to own a military weapon, like M-16, AK, or even something of newer design, manufactured last year. There is no good reason to impose a $200 tax. There is no good reason to require that law abiding citizens that do own said weapons should be on a registry. The fact is, it hinders our right to bear arms (any arm we should choose) for the very reason of overcoming the tyranny of government gone wild. BUT... unless we stand as a whole people, it will only continue to get more restrictive, just as the Governor of Pennsylvania said way back when, as he gave Parliament his thoughts on the matter of disarming the people. The fact is, it will never happen (standing united on the problem). Sad, but true. Did you see the author is from Midwest City? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
The second amendment and military grade firearms
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom