Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Theoretical legal question
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanis143" data-source="post: 3246161" data-attributes="member: 43724"><p>Heller disproves that theory. One man's lawsuit changed the laws in several states. Yes, he was a police officer, however his request for a 1 year license to keep a pistol in his house was denied. This is why I brought this idea up. Yes, people have banged their heads against the brick wall of NY and NJ gun laws for decades. This is different in that if the state is removing a vistor's right to self protection, then they should bear the burden of protecting that person while he/she is within their borders. </p><p></p><p>I'm just frustrated that several states are allowed to get away with blatant infringement and the courts somehow rule this as legal. It further blows my mind how residents of these states allowed this to happen without a fight. We had our change to push anti-gun regulation laws when Trump was inaugurated with republican control of congress. </p><p></p><p>I just hope that the leftists dont get full control of both executive and legislative branches next election.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanis143, post: 3246161, member: 43724"] Heller disproves that theory. One man's lawsuit changed the laws in several states. Yes, he was a police officer, however his request for a 1 year license to keep a pistol in his house was denied. This is why I brought this idea up. Yes, people have banged their heads against the brick wall of NY and NJ gun laws for decades. This is different in that if the state is removing a vistor's right to self protection, then they should bear the burden of protecting that person while he/she is within their borders. I'm just frustrated that several states are allowed to get away with blatant infringement and the courts somehow rule this as legal. It further blows my mind how residents of these states allowed this to happen without a fight. We had our change to push anti-gun regulation laws when Trump was inaugurated with republican control of congress. I just hope that the leftists dont get full control of both executive and legislative branches next election. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Theoretical legal question
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom