Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This Is........ AWESOME!!!!!!!!!
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cjjtulsa" data-source="post: 1632464" data-attributes="member: 6146"><p>Thankfully we've seen the light, and adopted a policy of global intervention into the business of every nation. So far since the Second World War, we've had how many armed actions against enemies that have never attacked us? WWII would have happened, regardless of whether we were isolationist or not, so that is a poor example. True, Paul's ideas of foreign policy wouldn't have stopped WWII, but I'd say they have a better chance of stopping the next war - STARTED BY US - than what the other goobers are putting forward.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see the disadvantage. And you might consider all of the flag-draped caskets coming home now, and for what? Those are lives needlessly lost, as far as I'm concerned.</p><p></p><p>There's a difference between isolationism and non-intervention.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cjjtulsa, post: 1632464, member: 6146"] Thankfully we've seen the light, and adopted a policy of global intervention into the business of every nation. So far since the Second World War, we've had how many armed actions against enemies that have never attacked us? WWII would have happened, regardless of whether we were isolationist or not, so that is a poor example. True, Paul's ideas of foreign policy wouldn't have stopped WWII, but I'd say they have a better chance of stopping the next war - STARTED BY US - than what the other goobers are putting forward. I don't see the disadvantage. And you might consider all of the flag-draped caskets coming home now, and for what? Those are lives needlessly lost, as far as I'm concerned. There's a difference between isolationism and non-intervention. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This Is........ AWESOME!!!!!!!!!
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom