Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This lawsuit against a gun shop sets a dangerous precedent
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2968417" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>If the parents knew (and apparently did know) this girl could not be trusted out in society, why did they not accompany her every where she went? Isn't that what parenthood demands - to be a guardian? Their daughter, being an adult, should have been reported to the police as such a danger, adjudicated thusly, and either held in custody until such time she can be trusted out in society.</p><p></p><p>I don't think simply placing her under the scrutiny of the NICS system would have prevented her from obtaining a gun and committing the crime. There was a case here in Oklahoma of a mentally deficient gay woman who was in prison for murdering her girlfriend, released, and within something like a week committed another murder with a gun. The NICS didn't keep her from obtaining a gun. Even if by some miracle the NICS did prevent her from obtaining a gun, what proof is there that she wouldn't murder by some other means?</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2968417, member: 745"] If the parents knew (and apparently did know) this girl could not be trusted out in society, why did they not accompany her every where she went? Isn't that what parenthood demands - to be a guardian? Their daughter, being an adult, should have been reported to the police as such a danger, adjudicated thusly, and either held in custody until such time she can be trusted out in society. I don't think simply placing her under the scrutiny of the NICS system would have prevented her from obtaining a gun and committing the crime. There was a case here in Oklahoma of a mentally deficient gay woman who was in prison for murdering her girlfriend, released, and within something like a week committed another murder with a gun. The NICS didn't keep her from obtaining a gun. Even if by some miracle the NICS did prevent her from obtaining a gun, what proof is there that she wouldn't murder by some other means? Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This lawsuit against a gun shop sets a dangerous precedent
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom