Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This lawsuit against a gun shop sets a dangerous precedent
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RugersGR8" data-source="post: 2968451" data-attributes="member: 56"><p>That thought had crossed my mind as well when I read the story. I agree with what Hoov and <a href="https://www.okshooters.com/members/cal7-62x39.6824/" target="_blank">cal7.62x39</a> have said. Who was the gun shop owner to believe---he could get sued either way he went. But as usual, the gun will be blamed and not the flawed system that allowed this to happen. Looks like there should be some type of law in the NICS background check that if you are a LGS owner and receive such a call, that you would be off the hook legally until it can be determined mental status of the person named in the call. But what happens if the person named in the call <strong>is mentally stable</strong> and <strong>needs the weapon for protection</strong> against a stalker or such, truly a sticky situation. It also scares me that if you give the power to take away guns from people, wouldn't that allow unethical/anti 2nd Amendment physicians to abuse the law? Isn't that the way that they get rid of their political opposition in Russia--declare them mentally deficient & send them to the gulag? You can, however, be sure the MSM will put the blame almost entirely on the gun and nothing else---never let a crisis go to waste.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RugersGR8, post: 2968451, member: 56"] That thought had crossed my mind as well when I read the story. I agree with what Hoov and [URL='https://www.okshooters.com/members/cal7-62x39.6824/']cal7.62x39[/URL] have said. Who was the gun shop owner to believe---he could get sued either way he went. But as usual, the gun will be blamed and not the flawed system that allowed this to happen. Looks like there should be some type of law in the NICS background check that if you are a LGS owner and receive such a call, that you would be off the hook legally until it can be determined mental status of the person named in the call. But what happens if the person named in the call [B]is mentally stable[/B] and [B]needs the weapon for protection[/B] against a stalker or such, truly a sticky situation. It also scares me that if you give the power to take away guns from people, wouldn't that allow unethical/anti 2nd Amendment physicians to abuse the law? Isn't that the way that they get rid of their political opposition in Russia--declare them mentally deficient & send them to the gulag? You can, however, be sure the MSM will put the blame almost entirely on the gun and nothing else---never let a crisis go to waste. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This lawsuit against a gun shop sets a dangerous precedent
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom