Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This lawsuit against a gun shop sets a dangerous precedent
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ShaunyP26" data-source="post: 2969069" data-attributes="member: 42035"><p>I know where you're going with this, but I think what matters is in a legal context. Like, would it be acceptable for a liquor store to refuse an alcohol sale based on a phone call stating a guy had cirrhosis or planned to be driving later? Even if the actual person buying the alcohol showed no suspicion in person? </p><p></p><p>I agree it's f'ed up and I personally wouldn't have done it in that situation, but the store owner should not be held liable if he followed legal protocol. Bad judgement that isn't illegal can't be a reason to be convicted. That's why I think a waiting period is maybe the only thing that could have solved it and I really don't have issues with them. In Missouri I had to wait 10 days when I bought my first pistol and I did not care at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ShaunyP26, post: 2969069, member: 42035"] I know where you're going with this, but I think what matters is in a legal context. Like, would it be acceptable for a liquor store to refuse an alcohol sale based on a phone call stating a guy had cirrhosis or planned to be driving later? Even if the actual person buying the alcohol showed no suspicion in person? I agree it's f'ed up and I personally wouldn't have done it in that situation, but the store owner should not be held liable if he followed legal protocol. Bad judgement that isn't illegal can't be a reason to be convicted. That's why I think a waiting period is maybe the only thing that could have solved it and I really don't have issues with them. In Missouri I had to wait 10 days when I bought my first pistol and I did not care at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
This lawsuit against a gun shop sets a dangerous precedent
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom