Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This makes me pretty angry
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werewolf" data-source="post: 1415758" data-attributes="member: 239"><p>Cite?</p><p> </p><p>I was taught in my CCW course by an attorney that OK does not directly recognize disparity of force as a justifiable use of deadly force.</p><p> </p><p>One must fear for their life, and the assailants must have the intent, opportunity and means to commit severe or lethal harm before one may use deadly force against them (exception to that being the SDA laws).</p><p> </p><p>In a case where a 100 teens are coming after you common sense would seem to be that yeah your life is threatened but how would you prove that <strong>the</strong> one that got shot and died met the criteria; especially if the unlucky one to get hit was 14 and a girl for example? Might be pretty tough to do. Shooting into a mob? Interesting legal question. Maybe one of our resident barristers can weigh in on this.</p><p> </p><p>That marine was in a really difficult situation. He and his wife were extremely lucky.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werewolf, post: 1415758, member: 239"] Cite? I was taught in my CCW course by an attorney that OK does not directly recognize disparity of force as a justifiable use of deadly force. One must fear for their life, and the assailants must have the intent, opportunity and means to commit severe or lethal harm before one may use deadly force against them (exception to that being the SDA laws). In a case where a 100 teens are coming after you common sense would seem to be that yeah your life is threatened but how would you prove that [B]the[/B] one that got shot and died met the criteria; especially if the unlucky one to get hit was 14 and a girl for example? Might be pretty tough to do. Shooting into a mob? Interesting legal question. Maybe one of our resident barristers can weigh in on this. That marine was in a really difficult situation. He and his wife were extremely lucky. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This makes me pretty angry
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom