Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This should spur some good debate
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aries" data-source="post: 3607728" data-attributes="member: 44328"><p>That, and several of his conclusions are based on speculation and assumptions that I don't think we know are true. I'm not sure we can be certain the gun was not pointed at Babbitt when he fires, since you can't see her at that point. And a 2D video through a piece of broken glass might be hard to tell exact angles.</p><p></p><p>The assumption that if she were shot in the neck, so the bullet would have to have hit her carotid artery and there should be more blood seems valid.... except autopsy reports state she was hit in the "left anterior shoulder".</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure what he is suggesting... that Babbitt, who was known by her family and friends as a Trump supporter, participated in a fake killing in order to make the government look better? I don't understand what he is saying the purpose is for staging her death, it seems contradictory. I'm missing something.</p><p></p><p>I love calling people "sheeple" when they don't agree with your narrative. If we accept his conclusion, would we still be "sheeple" just following a different shepherd? That's asinine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aries, post: 3607728, member: 44328"] That, and several of his conclusions are based on speculation and assumptions that I don't think we know are true. I'm not sure we can be certain the gun was not pointed at Babbitt when he fires, since you can't see her at that point. And a 2D video through a piece of broken glass might be hard to tell exact angles. The assumption that if she were shot in the neck, so the bullet would have to have hit her carotid artery and there should be more blood seems valid.... except autopsy reports state she was hit in the "left anterior shoulder". I'm not sure what he is suggesting... that Babbitt, who was known by her family and friends as a Trump supporter, participated in a fake killing in order to make the government look better? I don't understand what he is saying the purpose is for staging her death, it seems contradictory. I'm missing something. I love calling people "sheeple" when they don't agree with your narrative. If we accept his conclusion, would we still be "sheeple" just following a different shepherd? That's asinine. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
This should spur some good debate
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom