Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Thoughts on the 2nd Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 2029286" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>I was mainly speaking as a devil's advocate regarding the Muslim countries I mentioned. I tend to agree that not every society is ready for the self-rule of a free society. I tend to agree that things ran pretty smoothly under the listed dictators and they kept the real troublemakers under thumb. That's because some of us are realists. </p><p></p><p>The target audience for my musings however, would probably disagree. They think "diversity" is to be celebrated regardless of merit and that it's better to have free radicals running around with IED's and RPG's, than to have order issued from the barrel of a gun. These very same progressives will then go on to tell you it's OK to disarm our society and have order issued from the barrel of our government's guns, because we're a nation of laws. Daisy sniffers are an exceptionally naive bunch. </p><p></p><p>I'm beginning to see the reason they want guns banned is because subconsciously, they realize that they aren't trustworthy enough to bear arms. Their emotional state would cause them to misuse a firearm or they'd unintentionally cause harm through ineptitude and irresponsibility. They then project that same lack of trustworthiness onto those of us who are trustworthy. It would be an unfathomable concept to think otherwise for them. Witness all the calls for murdering NRA members on the Democratic Underground website.</p><p></p><p>Considering the current "progressive" groupthink and focus on collectivism, I'm beginning to wonder if they've devolved to the point that a democratic republic is no longer a viable form of government for them. Should we soon consider controlling them with a form of dictatorship or fiat government? Perhaps a military rule? They obviously can't be trusted with guns or voting or their own financial future. If they're going to become wards of the state, shouldn't the state have a say in how they're utilized for the greater good?</p><p></p><p>Of course I'm just spitballing here. I do find it amusing that they trust an armed force would always follow their edicts, but never give it a thought that those same armed lapdogs might eventually bite their masters! <img src="/images/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 2029286, member: 1132"] I was mainly speaking as a devil's advocate regarding the Muslim countries I mentioned. I tend to agree that not every society is ready for the self-rule of a free society. I tend to agree that things ran pretty smoothly under the listed dictators and they kept the real troublemakers under thumb. That's because some of us are realists. The target audience for my musings however, would probably disagree. They think "diversity" is to be celebrated regardless of merit and that it's better to have free radicals running around with IED's and RPG's, than to have order issued from the barrel of a gun. These very same progressives will then go on to tell you it's OK to disarm our society and have order issued from the barrel of our government's guns, because we're a nation of laws. Daisy sniffers are an exceptionally naive bunch. I'm beginning to see the reason they want guns banned is because subconsciously, they realize that they aren't trustworthy enough to bear arms. Their emotional state would cause them to misuse a firearm or they'd unintentionally cause harm through ineptitude and irresponsibility. They then project that same lack of trustworthiness onto those of us who are trustworthy. It would be an unfathomable concept to think otherwise for them. Witness all the calls for murdering NRA members on the Democratic Underground website. Considering the current "progressive" groupthink and focus on collectivism, I'm beginning to wonder if they've devolved to the point that a democratic republic is no longer a viable form of government for them. Should we soon consider controlling them with a form of dictatorship or fiat government? Perhaps a military rule? They obviously can't be trusted with guns or voting or their own financial future. If they're going to become wards of the state, shouldn't the state have a say in how they're utilized for the greater good? Of course I'm just spitballing here. I do find it amusing that they trust an armed force would always follow their edicts, but never give it a thought that those same armed lapdogs might eventually bite their masters! ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Thoughts on the 2nd Amendment
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom