Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Timothy Harper arrested..... finally! Idiot.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 3337022" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>Even if a person is aware of the law and the consequences of violating the law, a person cannot relinquish a right any more than one can be taken from that person. Not only is the law as it stands unconstitutional, it is antithetical to a basic human right.</p><p></p><p>When government forbids a person to keep and bear arms, it isn't about punishment. It is about control. It's about control that can only be viably enforced in prison or an institution. Setting someone free and telling them they can no longer keep and bear arms is counting on trust that said individual has been proven not to have. The only answer for someone adjudicated as being untrustworthy, for any individual not executed, is to kept that person in prison or an institution until it can be proven they are no longer a danger to society.</p><p></p><p>I am not okay with the current law. Too many dangerous people have been released into society just to save money.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 3337022, member: 745"] Even if a person is aware of the law and the consequences of violating the law, a person cannot relinquish a right any more than one can be taken from that person. Not only is the law as it stands unconstitutional, it is antithetical to a basic human right. When government forbids a person to keep and bear arms, it isn't about punishment. It is about control. It's about control that can only be viably enforced in prison or an institution. Setting someone free and telling them they can no longer keep and bear arms is counting on trust that said individual has been proven not to have. The only answer for someone adjudicated as being untrustworthy, for any individual not executed, is to kept that person in prison or an institution until it can be proven they are no longer a danger to society. I am not okay with the current law. Too many dangerous people have been released into society just to save money. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Timothy Harper arrested..... finally! Idiot.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom