Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
To Keep or Not
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow" data-source="post: 1251068" data-attributes="member: 7123"><p>Well, they're not my favorites, and they do have some drawbacks (high bore axis, a bit blocky), but I like them because (a) nice looking and well-made, reliable, nice sights, etc., (b) I prefer to have a de-cocker on a carry auto (either that or a 'pre-sprung DAO'), (c) good re-sale value / reputation. </p><p></p><p>I still prefer CZs and Kahrs (and a few others like 1911s & BHPs) to Sigs. But, Sigs are (obviously) worlds ahead of certain plastic junk, for example. <img src="/images/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Can't help you there. I don't do .40s anymore - divested myself of them, in part just to simplify - but in part because .40s batter & wear the pistol more over time than .45 or 9mm, and there's very little leeway for overcharged loads when you cram this round into a 9mm platform, espec. with makers who mill more than just a smidge of 6 o'clock web support out of the chamber. Again, junk / Glock - oh, but I repeat myself</p><p></p><p>[Don't get your panties in a twist guys - This is hyperbole. Obviously Glocks are not junk. They fine serviceable guns. It's just that they are extremely poor <em><strong>*RELATIVE TO*</strong></em> their reputation, hype, and price. It's ALL relative.]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, post: 1251068, member: 7123"] Well, they're not my favorites, and they do have some drawbacks (high bore axis, a bit blocky), but I like them because (a) nice looking and well-made, reliable, nice sights, etc., (b) I prefer to have a de-cocker on a carry auto (either that or a 'pre-sprung DAO'), (c) good re-sale value / reputation. I still prefer CZs and Kahrs (and a few others like 1911s & BHPs) to Sigs. But, Sigs are (obviously) worlds ahead of certain plastic junk, for example. ;) Can't help you there. I don't do .40s anymore - divested myself of them, in part just to simplify - but in part because .40s batter & wear the pistol more over time than .45 or 9mm, and there's very little leeway for overcharged loads when you cram this round into a 9mm platform, espec. with makers who mill more than just a smidge of 6 o'clock web support out of the chamber. Again, junk / Glock - oh, but I repeat myself [Don't get your panties in a twist guys - This is hyperbole. Obviously Glocks are not junk. They fine serviceable guns. It's just that they are extremely poor [I][B]*RELATIVE TO*[/B][/I] their reputation, hype, and price. It's ALL relative.] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
To Keep or Not
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom