Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Tulsa Airport now prohibitied?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ez bake" data-source="post: 800755" data-attributes="member: 229"><p>I get what you're saying man - and like I said, I respect your opinion on the matter based on how this situation affects you - and to be honest, more so because you're an established member on this board.</p><p></p><p>My main point is that so long as its outside the Security checkpoint, its not a matter of Federal authority (where CCW is concerned). I just hear a lot of arguments like "its the airport, so its federal, end of discussion", and that's not the case.</p><p></p><p>At that point, it falls under city/state laws, and then the only argument is whether or not the land-side of the airport is "the city doing business with the public". Because if its not, then its just another gun-buster sign placed there by someone.</p><p></p><p>The fact that the City had a hand in putting the sign there (to me) means that they have way overstepped their bounds as I don't feel in any way that they have a right to any input on the matter. </p><p></p><p>Stepping away from my opinion though, it does make for a powerful argument that the city's involvement may mean that the city thinks that the land-side of the airport is there for the city to do business with the public - which would mean a much bigger issue - and I see your point.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I think that someone needs to take on this matter as it appears to me to be a very clearly defined "private companies making a profit at a location" and yet the city thinks that it is "the city doing business with the public".</p><p></p><p>I never go to Tulsa Airport without having to fly, so since I have to pass the checkpoint (and I don't fancy getting body-cavity searched), I don't ever carry at the airport period. Its a good question for some of our budding young lawyers on here to contact the NRA and see if they feel its worth the trouble though (again, in my not-having-passed-the-bar opinion).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ez bake, post: 800755, member: 229"] I get what you're saying man - and like I said, I respect your opinion on the matter based on how this situation affects you - and to be honest, more so because you're an established member on this board. My main point is that so long as its outside the Security checkpoint, its not a matter of Federal authority (where CCW is concerned). I just hear a lot of arguments like "its the airport, so its federal, end of discussion", and that's not the case. At that point, it falls under city/state laws, and then the only argument is whether or not the land-side of the airport is "the city doing business with the public". Because if its not, then its just another gun-buster sign placed there by someone. The fact that the City had a hand in putting the sign there (to me) means that they have way overstepped their bounds as I don't feel in any way that they have a right to any input on the matter. Stepping away from my opinion though, it does make for a powerful argument that the city's involvement may mean that the city thinks that the land-side of the airport is there for the city to do business with the public - which would mean a much bigger issue - and I see your point. Personally, I think that someone needs to take on this matter as it appears to me to be a very clearly defined "private companies making a profit at a location" and yet the city thinks that it is "the city doing business with the public". I never go to Tulsa Airport without having to fly, so since I have to pass the checkpoint (and I don't fancy getting body-cavity searched), I don't ever carry at the airport period. Its a good question for some of our budding young lawyers on here to contact the NRA and see if they feel its worth the trouble though (again, in my not-having-passed-the-bar opinion). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Tulsa Airport now prohibitied?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom