Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Tulsa County Democrats want to infringe on 2A rights
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raoul Duke" data-source="post: 2239817" data-attributes="member: 27529"><p>I hope this doesn't totally derail this thread, but here it goes:</p><p></p><p>How about people who don't either don't know the difference or know but don't differentiate between fact and fiction like the people who share their "expertise" about masturbating fetuses or rape victims bodies being able to biologically recognize rape pregnancies to screen them and naturally abort those pregnancies that are the result of "legitimate rape" to explain their position? </p><p></p><p>How about the people who operate on emotion rather than intellect that make emotional appeals to "do it for the children" that pimp and parade precious children to divert the debate away from a rational adult discussion to market their message and to disingenuously denigrate, demonize and try to discredit their detractors as anti-children(i.e. baby killers), whether it be motivated by their passionate zeal for their policy or the passionate zeal for their profit.</p><p></p><p>How about the people who want to place restrictions on other people's ability to receive an abortion outside of their immediate family(spouse, juvenile children) that have absolutely no impact on themselves or anyone else personally, based solely on a moral or theocratic viewpoint, i.e. all life is sacred, etc. who don't think their moral or religious views are being respected unless other people are made to relent to them by force of law?</p><p></p><p>I'd say that pretty much covers the spectrum of the brain dead thought processes of the anti-abortion slogan swallowers, although I might have missed a shade or two, but that's who I had in mind.</p><p></p><p>Dont take it personally, unless any of that applies to you. If it does, you meet my definition. </p><p></p><p>It's really uncanny how the (above) descriptions can be so easily interchanged to describe brain dead antics of anti-2A slogan swallowers like MDAGS.</p><p></p><p>There's just so many parallels between them, like people who don't know a labia from a uterus speaking with "authority and expertise" on female reproductive rights to attempt to advance their anti abortion agenda and people who don't know a breech from a muzzle speaking with "authority and expertise " on firearms and second amendment rights to attempt to advance their anti-2A agenda. </p><p></p><p>Like I said earlier, they are different sides of the same coin.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raoul Duke, post: 2239817, member: 27529"] I hope this doesn't totally derail this thread, but here it goes: How about people who don't either don't know the difference or know but don't differentiate between fact and fiction like the people who share their "expertise" about masturbating fetuses or rape victims bodies being able to biologically recognize rape pregnancies to screen them and naturally abort those pregnancies that are the result of "legitimate rape" to explain their position? How about the people who operate on emotion rather than intellect that make emotional appeals to "do it for the children" that pimp and parade precious children to divert the debate away from a rational adult discussion to market their message and to disingenuously denigrate, demonize and try to discredit their detractors as anti-children(i.e. baby killers), whether it be motivated by their passionate zeal for their policy or the passionate zeal for their profit. How about the people who want to place restrictions on other people's ability to receive an abortion outside of their immediate family(spouse, juvenile children) that have absolutely no impact on themselves or anyone else personally, based solely on a moral or theocratic viewpoint, i.e. all life is sacred, etc. who don't think their moral or religious views are being respected unless other people are made to relent to them by force of law? I'd say that pretty much covers the spectrum of the brain dead thought processes of the anti-abortion slogan swallowers, although I might have missed a shade or two, but that's who I had in mind. Dont take it personally, unless any of that applies to you. If it does, you meet my definition. It's really uncanny how the (above) descriptions can be so easily interchanged to describe brain dead antics of anti-2A slogan swallowers like MDAGS. There's just so many parallels between them, like people who don't know a labia from a uterus speaking with "authority and expertise" on female reproductive rights to attempt to advance their anti abortion agenda and people who don't know a breech from a muzzle speaking with "authority and expertise " on firearms and second amendment rights to attempt to advance their anti-2A agenda. Like I said earlier, they are different sides of the same coin. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Tulsa County Democrats want to infringe on 2A rights
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom