Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tulsa school district about to substitute biology classes with 3 weeks of indoctrination on "sex Ed".
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trekrok" data-source="post: 3909770" data-attributes="member: 6668"><p>I did watch the video. How is what I screenshot sex education? The point of it is pregnancy and STIs, right? If that's not the point, fine, but don't try to label it as one thing when the curriculum is clearly much more. Call it gender sensitivity training and give a clear explanation of what is to be covered. The dishonesty of labelling this 'sex education' and then not requiring a parent's affirmative approval is a problem for me. </p><p></p><p>And my point on STIs and LGBTQ+ was in terms of studying the biases, the plethora of genders and 'imagining another gender' etc. I would assume the physical risks on the LGBTQ front would be covered in some detail when talking about HIV and other STIs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trekrok, post: 3909770, member: 6668"] I did watch the video. How is what I screenshot sex education? The point of it is pregnancy and STIs, right? If that's not the point, fine, but don't try to label it as one thing when the curriculum is clearly much more. Call it gender sensitivity training and give a clear explanation of what is to be covered. The dishonesty of labelling this 'sex education' and then not requiring a parent's affirmative approval is a problem for me. And my point on STIs and LGBTQ+ was in terms of studying the biases, the plethora of genders and 'imagining another gender' etc. I would assume the physical risks on the LGBTQ front would be covered in some detail when talking about HIV and other STIs. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Tulsa school district about to substitute biology classes with 3 weeks of indoctrination on "sex Ed".
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom