Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
U.S. ambassador to Libya, and 3 others killed.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1898944" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>I know on my part, that has absolutely nothing to do with it. I preach all the time that we need to stop these incessant expeditionary wars and so-called "peacekeeping missions". Yet I always support a vigorous response to an actual attack, even if it's just a brief in and out incursion. This is exactly the scenario I fully support that option, if satisfactory diplomatic responses and reparations are not made by the host country. </p><p></p><p>In other words the level of U.S. response that could range from acceptance of a formal public apology and full cooperation in the pursuit of the criminals, to full scale bombings and military blockades that will negatively impact their country and by extension, their citizens, is fully within their control. Their hands are on the rudder of their fate, not ours. <img src="/images/smilies/frown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1898944, member: 1132"] I know on my part, that has absolutely nothing to do with it. I preach all the time that we need to stop these incessant expeditionary wars and so-called "peacekeeping missions". Yet I always support a vigorous response to an actual attack, even if it's just a brief in and out incursion. This is exactly the scenario I fully support that option, if satisfactory diplomatic responses and reparations are not made by the host country. In other words the level of U.S. response that could range from acceptance of a formal public apology and full cooperation in the pursuit of the criminals, to full scale bombings and military blockades that will negatively impact their country and by extension, their citizens, is fully within their control. Their hands are on the rudder of their fate, not ours. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
U.S. ambassador to Libya, and 3 others killed.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom