Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
UN Arms Treaty
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokem807" data-source="post: 1981793" data-attributes="member: 7378"><p>The point isn't whether or not the UN treaty is ratified, but rather that Obama is signaling his intentions. I think you'll see a shift in the Supreme Court which will set the stage for judicial activism (AKA legislating from the bench). How about executive orders? If you honestly think that our rights--not just 2A, by the way--will not be eroded in the next four years, then good luck with that. I hope that ya'll are right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokem807, post: 1981793, member: 7378"] The point isn't whether or not the UN treaty is ratified, but rather that Obama is signaling his intentions. I think you'll see a shift in the Supreme Court which will set the stage for judicial activism (AKA legislating from the bench). How about executive orders? If you honestly think that our rights--not just 2A, by the way--will not be eroded in the next four years, then good luck with that. I hope that ya'll are right. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
UN Arms Treaty
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom