Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
UN Gun Ban Treaty
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ace_on_the_Turn" data-source="post: 2780161" data-attributes="member: 27417"><p>Yes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Has nothing to do with the laws of the United States nor will it, in any way, affect the 2nd.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He can't. Not legally at least. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/unratified-us-controversial-un-arms-treaty-enters-force" target="_blank">Similarly, Germanys mission to the U.N. in a release this month described the ATT as a legally binding treaty that will regulate the international arms trade by establishing universal criteria for the export and import of arms.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/unratified-us-controversial-un-arms-treaty-enters-force" target="_blank"></a></p><p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/unratified-us-controversial-un-arms-treaty-enters-force" target="_blank">Not so, says Heritage Foundation senior research fellow Ted Bromund.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/unratified-us-controversial-un-arms-treaty-enters-force" target="_blank"></a></p><p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/unratified-us-controversial-un-arms-treaty-enters-force" target="_blank">Both the administration and Congress should formally state that the ATT is simply a treaty, that it is binding only on nations that have ratified it, that it is not customary international law, and that <strong>its entry into force has no implications for the U.S.</strong>, he said in a recent issue brief.</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ace_on_the_Turn, post: 2780161, member: 27417"] Yes. Has nothing to do with the laws of the United States nor will it, in any way, affect the 2nd. He can't. Not legally at least. [URL="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/unratified-us-controversial-un-arms-treaty-enters-force"]Similarly, Germanys mission to the U.N. in a release this month described the ATT as a legally binding treaty that will regulate the international arms trade by establishing universal criteria for the export and import of arms. Not so, says Heritage Foundation senior research fellow Ted Bromund. Both the administration and Congress should formally state that the ATT is simply a treaty, that it is binding only on nations that have ratified it, that it is not customary international law, and that [B]its entry into force has no implications for the U.S.[/B], he said in a recent issue brief.[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
UN Gun Ban Treaty
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom