1. Welcome to Oklahoma Shooters Association! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

Unilever Threatens to Reduce Ad Spending on Tech Platforms That Don’t Combat Divisive Content

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Dave70968, Feb 12, 2018.

  1. Dave70968

    Dave70968 Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    2,897
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Location:
    Norman
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/unilev...-that-dont-combat-divisive-content-1518398578

    Unilever PLC is threatening to pull back its advertising from popular tech platforms, including YouTube and Facebook Inc., if they don’t do more to combat the spread of fake news, hate speech and divisive content.

    “Unilever will not invest in platforms or environments that do not protect our children or which create division in society, and promote anger or hate,” Unilever Chief Marketing Officer Keith Weed is expected to say Monday during the Interactive Advertising Bureau’s annual leadership meeting in Palm Desert, Calif.

    “We will prioritize investing only in responsible platforms that are committed to creating a positive impact in society,” he will say, according to prepared remarks.

    Unilever, one of the world’s largest advertisers, is leveraging its spending power to push the digital media industry to weed out content that funds terrorism, exploits children, spreads false news or supports racist and sexist views. The consumer-products giant spent more than $9 billion marketing its brands such as Lipton, Dove and Knorr last year, according to the company’s annual report.

    In the wake of the 2016 election, YouTube, Facebook and other tech companies have come under scrutiny for allowing the spread of misinformation—criticism partly fueled by evidence that Russian actors used their platforms to disseminate information designed to manipulate U.S. voters.

    Meanwhile, YouTube, which is owned by Alphabet Inc.’s Google, has taken plenty of heat for running ads alongside extremist, racist and hateful videos, forcing brands to suspend advertising on the site. Most recently, brands were discovered to be appearing next to videos that seemed to attract pedophile viewers.

    This is about “having a positive impact on society and whether we as a company want to engage with companies that are not committed to making a positive impact,” Mr. Weed said in an interview.

    Unilever has been among the more outspoken advertisers pushing for the online ad industry to clean up the ad fraud that exists on the web and offer up stronger measurement standards to ensure that advertisers are buying ads that can be seen by real people.

    While the company continues to push for those initiatives, Mr. Weed said that consumers don’t care about online advertising measurement issues. They do care about “fake news” and “Russians influencing the U.S. election,” he added.

    Rather than issue a public list of demands, Mr. Weed said he wants to work privately with the tech companies to come up with solutions. Unilever said it has already held discussions with companies such as Facebook, Google, Twitter Inc., Snap Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. to share ideas about what each can do to improve.

    “We fully support Unilever’s commitments and are working closely with them,” said a spokeswoman for Facebook. Twitter also said it’s supportive of Unilever’s position.

    A spokeswoman for Google declined to comment, while the other firms didn’t respond to requests for comment.

    The tech companies had already been trying to rectify some of their problems. Facebook recently announced major changes to its algorithm intended to address concerns over the quality of the content on its site and its effect on the world.

    Meanwhile, YouTube has made improvements to the technology it uses to screen videos, added more human reviewers and given marketers more control over where their ads appear.

    Mr. Weed said he is encouraged by the recent moves, which he described as “meaningful,” but said more work is needed. For example, he said YouTube hasn’t done enough to protect children.

    Last month, YouTube said that it would have humans review every second of video that is included in its Google Preferred program, which is a subset of YouTube videos that is among the most popular and for which marketers pay a premium to advertise alongside.

    “I believe they should still go further and human screen all videos with children that are monetized,” he said during the interview.

    In regards to Facebook, Mr. Weed said the company has taken some positive steps at trying to alleviate the fake news issue, but there is “more to do.”

    Mr. Weed said that advertisers need to be outspoken about issues on tech platforms, since they are almost entirely supported by billions of ad dollars.

    “One can start by not putting ads on content we do not want to encourage,” he said.

    The annual conference for the IAB, an online advertising trade body, has become a platform for big-name advertisers to publicly push for change.

    During last year’s conference, Procter & Gamble , the world’s largest advertiser, issued an ultimatum to digital giants to clean up online advertising.

    P&G’s chief brand officer, Marc Pritchard, laid out a list of demands that included the sector adopt one viewability standard and allow an independent measurement watchdog to audit some platforms’ ad metrics. He later also demanded that tech companies such as YouTube come up with greater controls around their content to avoid having ads appear near controversial content such as ISIS videos.

    A year after “the gauntlet was thrown, the progress has been impressive,” said Mr. Pritchard in a recent interview. He said 90% of his demands have been met and the company is just waiting for the Media Rating Council to finish auditing some of the ad metrics of Google and Facebook.

    Write to Suzanne Vranica at suzanne.vranica@wsj.com
     
  2. TerryMiller

    TerryMiller Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    1,249
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Location:
    Here, but occasionally There.
    With regards to fake news being on social media, perhaps the Democrats might want to reincarnate their old demand for equal representation of both sides on a specific news topic? It was called the "Fairness Doctrine," and they cried mightily when there was more than one conservative on a "discussion panel." They wanted to use the doctrine to limit the free speech of any news entity that wanted to show a conservative aspect of a story.

    Oddly enough, FOX News came along and seems to have more "liberal contributors" than the mainstream media has in the way of "conservative contributors." In other words, the Dems don't seem to call for the Fairness Doctrine anymore.
     
  3. TonyKane1

    TonyKane1 Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    3,689
    Likes Received:
    706
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Location:
    Shawnee, OK
    Rating
    100%
    And the few conservative people on the liberal msm always get ganged up on by the liberals. They won’t let the conservative get one word in. It’s 4-5 against 1. How people in this country cannot see past this crap just really puts me at a loss for words.
     
    Seadog and chadh2o like this.
  4. chuter

    chuter Sharpshooter

    Supporter
    Messages:
    1,332
    Likes Received:
    334
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Location:
    Piedmont, OK
    Rating
    100%
    I guess anything MAGA will be considered divisive....?
     
  5. Catt57

    Catt57 Gill-Gun Guru

    Supporter
    Messages:
    1,201
    Likes Received:
    738
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2014
    Location:
    OKC/Bristow
    Rating
    100%
    This country was created by divisive speech and actions....
     
    Seadog likes this.
  6. Dave70968

    Dave70968 Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    2,897
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Location:
    Norman
    "Both" sides? Since when are there only two?
     
  7. TerryMiller

    TerryMiller Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    6,245
    Likes Received:
    1,249
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Location:
    Here, but occasionally There.
    Do any of the "others" have any traction?
     
  8. Dave70968

    Dave70968 Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    5,484
    Likes Received:
    2,897
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Location:
    Norman
    There may be two major parties, but that doesn't mean they're the only two sides to the argument. Your position is holding firmly to Noam Chomsky's famous advice:
    "The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum – even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate."
    --Noam Chomsky, The Common Good, 1998​
     

Share This Page