Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
University of Chicago Anti-Violence program
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaparral" data-source="post: 3769633" data-attributes="member: 49817"><p>The “control group” was comprised 100% of men turned away by the program. This is not “the gold standard” for a control group. This is the gold standard for controlling your outcome. the study should include an equal number of men randomly chosen from the general population. Using those denied access to the program as a guide group May be considered beneficial however we have been given no information as to why the people were turned away. Predictably those who received direct interaction and were chosen personally by the researchers showed better results. This is an internal bias within the study. Could programs like this help? Possibly. Are programs like this greatly beneficial? We are not given a research program with proper data with which to make a determination.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaparral, post: 3769633, member: 49817"] The “control group” was comprised 100% of men turned away by the program. This is not “the gold standard” for a control group. This is the gold standard for controlling your outcome. the study should include an equal number of men randomly chosen from the general population. Using those denied access to the program as a guide group May be considered beneficial however we have been given no information as to why the people were turned away. Predictably those who received direct interaction and were chosen personally by the researchers showed better results. This is an internal bias within the study. Could programs like this help? Possibly. Are programs like this greatly beneficial? We are not given a research program with proper data with which to make a determination. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
University of Chicago Anti-Violence program
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom