Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unmarked police cars in Tulsa…
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KurtM" data-source="post: 4169918" data-attributes="member: 6064"><p>"Since we are doing this, can you point out where it mentions semi-automatics?"</p><p></p><p>Ahhh I love this pedantic little saw!!! Quick answer is show me where it doesn't!</p><p>Longer answer..... You have to know a bit of history. The good old trotted out answer is a muzzle loading musket is all the founding fathers knew...... And I would immediately call BS!!!</p><p>The average, once again, average Continental soldier had said musket, and a big old bayonet on the end of said musket for when it was empty, a short sword or big knife on belt for when said musket and bayonet was too long for close in fighting. Now that wasn't all... Many also carried a hatchet, Tomahawk, and up to 3-4 pistols into combat. The thought that these guys shot one round and then leisurely stood around loading their next round, is pure Fallacy! BTW said musket and pistols were also used as bludgeons. This idea of " it give people lots of time to rush them as they reload" is idiocy of the first degree!!!</p><p>On to one of your other talking points. Yes I have used a firearm to defend my life. The only reason I am typing this now, and not a statistic is the fact that I was armed and aware. I was on my third and final magazine when it finally ended, so I feel I can speak to your "you only need 10 rounds in magazine". This is absolutely false equivocation!!!!! This was only 4 guys who wanted A. My wife, B. What ever I had on me, And C. Me, and eventually her dead, and only one of them were exceptionally willing to continue after the first exchange.... Well one wasn't going to continue. </p><p>So tell me why do police need 17 round magazines to save their lives, but I only need 10? Why do you think no one will ever be accosted by multiple opponents? </p><p>What makes you feel people will be more moral with limited ammunition</p><p> Your view points come from someone who has never had to deal with the darker side of our society, and I really hope you never do, but I can guarantee you that your view point is based on absolute fallacy, both in history and present!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KurtM, post: 4169918, member: 6064"] "Since we are doing this, can you point out where it mentions semi-automatics?" Ahhh I love this pedantic little saw!!! Quick answer is show me where it doesn't! Longer answer..... You have to know a bit of history. The good old trotted out answer is a muzzle loading musket is all the founding fathers knew...... And I would immediately call BS!!! The average, once again, average Continental soldier had said musket, and a big old bayonet on the end of said musket for when it was empty, a short sword or big knife on belt for when said musket and bayonet was too long for close in fighting. Now that wasn't all... Many also carried a hatchet, Tomahawk, and up to 3-4 pistols into combat. The thought that these guys shot one round and then leisurely stood around loading their next round, is pure Fallacy! BTW said musket and pistols were also used as bludgeons. This idea of " it give people lots of time to rush them as they reload" is idiocy of the first degree!!! On to one of your other talking points. Yes I have used a firearm to defend my life. The only reason I am typing this now, and not a statistic is the fact that I was armed and aware. I was on my third and final magazine when it finally ended, so I feel I can speak to your "you only need 10 rounds in magazine". This is absolutely false equivocation!!!!! This was only 4 guys who wanted A. My wife, B. What ever I had on me, And C. Me, and eventually her dead, and only one of them were exceptionally willing to continue after the first exchange.... Well one wasn't going to continue. So tell me why do police need 17 round magazines to save their lives, but I only need 10? Why do you think no one will ever be accosted by multiple opponents? What makes you feel people will be more moral with limited ammunition Your view points come from someone who has never had to deal with the darker side of our society, and I really hope you never do, but I can guarantee you that your view point is based on absolute fallacy, both in history and present! [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Unmarked police cars in Tulsa…
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
