Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Upcoming job loss
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joegrizzy" data-source="post: 3652278" data-attributes="member: 45524"><p>uniparty is a thing and has been for a long time; the foreign policy (ya even the policy regarding foreigners) has been clear no matter who was in the white house for my entire lifetime. i remember GWB saying "it's not amnesty!" to......an amnesty bill. i wasn't around in 1965, but i bet i would have been fired up about the massive immigration overhaul. pretty wild to go back and listen to the debates on the bill, i used to think it was frighteningly accurate what the "slippery slopers" were preaching, but now i simply realize they just knew what the plan was and anyone not on board would soon be called a racist and gone.</p><p></p><p>i'm wondering every day if part of the of deal congress made after they reconvened on Jan 6 (at that point, Jan 7) was to say "okay, we'll say biden wins, we will vacate the executive, he doesn't do anything at this point anyway. the figurehead will still be there and no one will question it."</p><p></p><p>that's why he didn't get the actual inauguration process that *every* other president has received.</p><p>that's why he's broadcasting from sets across the street from the whitehouse and totally claiming he's not.</p><p>that's why kamala is also basically out of the picture.</p><p>biden thinks he's in charge; he doesn't know.</p><p></p><p>just like trump thought he was in charge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joegrizzy, post: 3652278, member: 45524"] uniparty is a thing and has been for a long time; the foreign policy (ya even the policy regarding foreigners) has been clear no matter who was in the white house for my entire lifetime. i remember GWB saying "it's not amnesty!" to......an amnesty bill. i wasn't around in 1965, but i bet i would have been fired up about the massive immigration overhaul. pretty wild to go back and listen to the debates on the bill, i used to think it was frighteningly accurate what the "slippery slopers" were preaching, but now i simply realize they just knew what the plan was and anyone not on board would soon be called a racist and gone. i'm wondering every day if part of the of deal congress made after they reconvened on Jan 6 (at that point, Jan 7) was to say "okay, we'll say biden wins, we will vacate the executive, he doesn't do anything at this point anyway. the figurehead will still be there and no one will question it." that's why he didn't get the actual inauguration process that *every* other president has received. that's why he's broadcasting from sets across the street from the whitehouse and totally claiming he's not. that's why kamala is also basically out of the picture. biden thinks he's in charge; he doesn't know. just like trump thought he was in charge. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Upcoming job loss
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom