Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Utah: Drunk Driving Bill Has Unintended Negative Consequences on Gun Rights
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConstitutionCowboy" data-source="post: 2973237" data-attributes="member: 745"><p>They've got this bill bass ackwards. Being under the influence should not be a cause for not carrying a gun. Being under the influence while carrying a gun is the problem. It needs to be about drinking while carrying. Such a law would not infringe upon the Right to Keep and Bear Arms - it would infringe instead upon drinking intoxicants while carrying which is not protected in the Constitution as a right. There can be no negative arms related consequences to being under the influence. It needs to be only about being under the influence.</p><p></p><p>It might be a tough concept to grasp, but if you think about it, it does make sense.</p><p></p><p>Woody</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConstitutionCowboy, post: 2973237, member: 745"] They've got this bill bass ackwards. Being under the influence should not be a cause for not carrying a gun. Being under the influence while carrying a gun is the problem. It needs to be about drinking while carrying. Such a law would not infringe upon the Right to Keep and Bear Arms - it would infringe instead upon drinking intoxicants while carrying which is not protected in the Constitution as a right. There can be no negative arms related consequences to being under the influence. It needs to be only about being under the influence. It might be a tough concept to grasp, but if you think about it, it does make sense. Woody [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Utah: Drunk Driving Bill Has Unintended Negative Consequences on Gun Rights
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom