Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warning From Canadian
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gerhard1" data-source="post: 3047624" data-attributes="member: 5391"><p>Registration leads to confiscation.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]LIrBUrFV2Ac[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>I might point out as well, that the 'reasonable' Universal Background Checks cannot be enforced without registration. That criminals get guns through private sales is a red herring. The fact is that in many cases guns sold in this manner disappear from the radar and that is what the gun-grabbers are really afraid of. Criminals are merely an excuse.</p><p></p><p>Take the AWB passed by Congress in 1993. WaPo was surprisingly honest about both the effect and the intent of the law. They said that the law would have almost no effect on violent crime, but its main value was as a steppingstone for more 'comprehensive' laws later.</p><p></p><p>Then we have Nelson P. 'Pete' Shields who lost his son the 1974 San Francisco Zebra murders and later went on to found Handgun Control, Inc., (which merged with another organization and became the Brady Campaign) and his statement two years later.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And to be fair, Brady says their goal now is not banning handguns--I have my doubts about this--but reducing gun violence. However, these statements remain. </p><p></p><p>UBC's themselves sound like a good idea, until you look closer. </p><p></p><p>What the Brady people really want, I think, is what is contained in Pete Shields' statement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gerhard1, post: 3047624, member: 5391"] Registration leads to confiscation. [MEDIA=youtube]LIrBUrFV2Ac[/MEDIA] I might point out as well, that the 'reasonable' Universal Background Checks cannot be enforced without registration. That criminals get guns through private sales is a red herring. The fact is that in many cases guns sold in this manner disappear from the radar and that is what the gun-grabbers are really afraid of. Criminals are merely an excuse. Take the AWB passed by Congress in 1993. WaPo was surprisingly honest about both the effect and the intent of the law. They said that the law would have almost no effect on violent crime, but its main value was as a steppingstone for more 'comprehensive' laws later. Then we have Nelson P. 'Pete' Shields who lost his son the 1974 San Francisco Zebra murders and later went on to found Handgun Control, Inc., (which merged with another organization and became the Brady Campaign) and his statement two years later. And to be fair, Brady says their goal now is not banning handguns--I have my doubts about this--but reducing gun violence. However, these statements remain. UBC's themselves sound like a good idea, until you look closer. What the Brady people really want, I think, is what is contained in Pete Shields' statement. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warning From Canadian
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom