Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tweetr" data-source="post: 3943886" data-attributes="member: 5183"><p>Exactly right. The Judiciary has <em><strong>zero</strong></em> power to amend, limit, nullify, or otherwise alter the Constitution itself. That power rests solely with the Legislative branch and the states.</p><p></p><p>The practical application of this understanding is that case law, judiciary decisions, have no power to alter what is in the Constitution itself. Thus to claim that one cannot understand the Fourth Amendment by reading it is utterly specious. That is exactly how one understands it.</p><p></p><p>Resort to case law to <strong><em>alter, limit, or modify</em></strong> what is there is wholly invalid, for case law has not that power.</p><p></p><p>Thus if the text of the Fourth Amendment declares "shall not be violated," then case law has not the power to insert exceptions wherein its right <strong><em>may be violated</em></strong> unless such exceptions exist in the text itself, or unless the text itself is properly amended to specify such exceptions. Manifestly such text and such amendment do not exist, therefore case law has not the power to insert such exceptions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tweetr, post: 3943886, member: 5183"] Exactly right. The Judiciary has [I][B]zero[/B][/I] power to amend, limit, nullify, or otherwise alter the Constitution itself. That power rests solely with the Legislative branch and the states. The practical application of this understanding is that case law, judiciary decisions, have no power to alter what is in the Constitution itself. Thus to claim that one cannot understand the Fourth Amendment by reading it is utterly specious. That is exactly how one understands it. Resort to case law to [B][I]alter, limit, or modify[/I][/B] what is there is wholly invalid, for case law has not that power. Thus if the text of the Fourth Amendment declares "shall not be violated," then case law has not the power to insert exceptions wherein its right [B][I]may be violated[/I][/B] unless such exceptions exist in the text itself, or unless the text itself is properly amended to specify such exceptions. Manifestly such text and such amendment do not exist, therefore case law has not the power to insert such exceptions. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Warrantless search - Rogers County
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom