Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Was It All For Naught?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 3369526" data-attributes="member: 42"><p>Nope. A lot more science goes into that. Population density (one has about 24 people per sq Km, the other about 15 for example), mobility of said population, demographics of the population, testing rates per capita etc...without comparing ALL of that it's anecdotal. I didn't read enough to see if he did that comparison and corrected for it. Did he? You also have to look at what voluntary precautions the populations were undertaking (dine in might not have been closed but did people stop going out to eat?). Was one population more cautious than the other naturally, without government edict?</p><p></p><p>It would really require an exhaustive, thorough, scientific, and peer reviewed study...or a time machine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SMS, post: 3369526, member: 42"] Nope. A lot more science goes into that. Population density (one has about 24 people per sq Km, the other about 15 for example), mobility of said population, demographics of the population, testing rates per capita etc...without comparing ALL of that it's anecdotal. I didn't read enough to see if he did that comparison and corrected for it. Did he? You also have to look at what voluntary precautions the populations were undertaking (dine in might not have been closed but did people stop going out to eat?). Was one population more cautious than the other naturally, without government edict? It would really require an exhaustive, thorough, scientific, and peer reviewed study...or a time machine. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Was It All For Naught?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom